Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Sonnentag (2003)
Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work.The Journal of applied psychology, 88 3
P.J. Howard, J.M. Howard
The Owner's Manual for Personality at Work
M. Koyuncu, R. Burke, L. Fiksenbaum (2006)
Work engagement among women managers and professionals in a Turkish bankEquality, Diversity and Inclusion, 25
M. Csikszentmihalyi
Flow
P. Janssen, W. Schaufeli, I. Houkes (1999)
Work-related and individual determinants of the three burnout dimensionsWork & Stress, 13
S. Langelaan, A. Bakker, L. Doornen, W. Schaufeli (2006)
Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference?Personality and Individual Differences, 40
C. Maslach, W.B. Schaufeli, M.P. Leiter
Job burnout
William Kahn (1990)
Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at WorkAcademy of Management Journal, 33
R. Eisenberger, Jason Jones, F. Stinglhamber, L. Shanock, Amanda Randall (2005)
Flow experiences at work: for high need achievers alone?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26
E. Gubman (2004)
From Engagement to Passion for Work: The Search for the Missing Person, 27
Karin Lindblom, S. Linton, C. Fedeli, I. Bryngelsson (2006)
Burnout in the working population: relations to psychosocial work factorsInternational Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 13
Purpose – Part I of this paper addressed the environmental and leadership factors that contribute to employee engagement. Next, the purpose of this paper is to add the job and person to the engagement equation. Design/methodology/approach – Summarizes the characteristics of engaging jobs. Then, reviews individual personality traits that engaged individuals are more likely to exhibit: hardiness, internal locus of control, active coping style, high self esteem, low neuroticism, and high extraversion. Finally, discusses the importance of a “match” between the employee's preferences and the general work conditions and offers performance improvement implications. Findings – Engagement is a complex topic and a challenging goal. An engagement‐friendly culture values the diversity of talents employees bring to the table, respects individual needs, and inspires all employees to pursue a common and exciting vision of the future. Logically, engagement will not be impacted by a single training program, regardless of its quality. Enhancing engagement is a long‐term proposition. Originality/value – Individuals are unlikely to become engaged because someone told them they should. Engagement occurs naturally, when the conditions are right, when the leaders are inspiring, when individuals find the ideal place in which to apply their strengths. If this is true, performance improvement professionals might consider the following interventions: educate the leaders; focus on career development; champion work‐life balance; encourage relationships.
Industrial and Commercial Training – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 13, 2008
Keywords: Employee attitudes; Job satisfaction; Personality; Business environment
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.