Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Juan-juan Peng, Jian-qiang Wang, Xiao-hui Wu, Chao Tian (2017)
Hesitant Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators Based on the Archimedean t-Norms and t-ConormsInternational Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19
T. Cao, N. Noi (2010)
A framework for linguistic logic programmingInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25
A. Ahmadi-Javid, Malihe Fallah-Tafti (2017)
Portfolio optimization with entropic value-at-riskEur. J. Oper. Res., 279
K. Gupta, Sanjay Kumar (2018)
Hesitant probabilistic fuzzy set based time series forecasting methodGranular Computing
Xiaoyang Zhou, Liqin Wang, Huchang Liao, Shouyang Wang, B. Lev, H. Fujita (2019)
A prospect theory-based group decision approach considering consensus for portfolio selection with hesitant fuzzy informationKnowl. Based Syst., 168
Fangju Jiang, Qing-Lu Ma (2018)
Multi-attribute group decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment with application to evaluate the transformation efficiencyApplied Intelligence, 48
Weike Zhang, Jiang Du, Xiaoli Tian (2018)
FINDING A PROMISING VENTURE CAPITAL PROJECT WITH TODIM UNDER PROBABILISTIC HESITANT FUZZY CIRCUMSTANCETechnological and Economic Development of Economy
Information and Control, 8
Suleyman Basak, Alex Shapiro (1999)
Value-at-Risk Based Risk Management: Optimal Policies and Asset PricesBanking & Financial Institutions
Bo Wang, You Li, Shuming Wang, J. Watada (2018)
A Multi-Objective Portfolio Selection Model With Fuzzy Value-at-Risk RatioIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 26
A. Roy (1952)
Safety first and the holding of assettsEconometrica, 20
Gevorg Hunanyan (2019)
Portfolio SelectionFinanzwirtschaft, Banken und Bankmanagement I Finance, Banks and Bank Management
M. Xia, Zeshui Xu (2011)
Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision makingInt. J. Approx. Reason., 52
The Review of Financial Studies, 14
W. Zhou, Zeshui Xu (2015)
Optimal discrete fitting aggregation approach with hesitant fuzzy informationKnowl. Based Syst., 78
A. Moussa, J. Kamdem, M. Terraza (2014)
Fuzzy value-at-risk and expected shortfall for portfolios with heavy-tailed returnsEconomic Modelling, 39
Mei Chiu, H. Wong, Duan Li (2012)
Roy’s Safety‐First Portfolio Principle in Financial Risk Management of Disastrous EventsRisk Analysis, 32
R. Rockafellar, S. Uryasev (2001)
Conditional Value-at-Risk for General Loss DistributionsCorporate Finance and Organizations eJournal
Xiaodi Liu, Zengwen Wang, Shitao Zhang, Jiashu Liu (2020)
Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making based on regret theory for the evaluation of venture capital projectsEconomic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33
Zeshui Xu, W. Zhou (2017)
Consensus building with a group of decision makers under the hesitant probabilistic fuzzy environmentFuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16
K. Atanassov (1986)
Intuitionistic fuzzy setsFuzzy Sets and Systems, 20
L. Zadeh (1996)
Fuzzy sets
Zdeněk Zmeškal (2005)
Value at risk methodology under soft conditions approach (fuzzy-stochastic approach)Eur. J. Oper. Res., 161
International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25
Xiaoli Tian, Zeshui Xu, H. Fujita (2018)
Sequential funding the venture project or not? A prospect consensus process with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference informationKnowl. Based Syst., 161
Zhan Su, Zeshui Xu, Hua Zhao, Zhinan Hao, Bei Chen (2019)
Entropy Measures for Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy InformationIEEE Access, 7
W. Zhou, Zeshui Xu (2017)
Expected hesitant VaR for tail decision making under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environmentAppl. Soft Comput., 60
Shuming Wang, J. Watada, W. Pedrycz (2009)
Value-at-Risk-Based Two-Stage Fuzzy Facility Location ProblemsIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 5
G. Alexander, Alexandre Baptista (2002)
Economic implications of using a mean-VaR model for portfolio selection: A comparison with mean-variance analysisJournal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26
H. Katagiri, Takeshi Uno, Kosuke Kato, H. Tsuda, H. Tsubaki (2013)
Random fuzzy multi-objective linear programming: Optimization of possibilistic value at risk (pVaR)Expert Syst. Appl., 40
Z. Qin, Yuanzhen Dai, Haitao Zheng (2017)
Uncertain random portfolio optimization models based on value-at-riskJ. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 32
Zhinan Hao, Zeshui Xu, Hua Zhao, Zhan Su (2017)
Probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy set and its application in risk evaluationKnowl. Based Syst., 127
Mohuya Kar, S. Kar, Sini Guo, Xiang Li, S. Majumder (2019)
A new bi-objective fuzzy portfolio selection model and its solution through evolutionary algorithmsSoft Computing, 23
Zhong-xing Wang, Jian Li (2017)
Correlation Coefficients of Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Elements and Their Applications to Evaluation of the AlternativesSymmetry, 9
T. Beder (1995)
VAR: Seductive but DangerousFinancial Analysts Journal, 51
Journal of Banking and Finance, 26
Yu Chen, Zhicheng Wang, Zhengjun Zhang (2019)
Mark to market value at riskJournal of Econometrics
Wei Zhou, Zeshui Xu (2018)
Score‐hesitation trade‐off and portfolio selection under intuitionistic fuzzy environmentInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 34
W. Zhou, Zeshui Xu (2017)
Portfolio selection and risk investment under the hesitant fuzzy environmentKnowl. Based Syst., 144
This paper aims to propose two portfolio selection models with hesitant value-at-risk (HVaR) – HVaR fuzzy portfolio selection model (HVaR-FPSM) and HVaR-score fuzzy portfolio selection model (HVaR-S-FPSM) – to help investors solve the problem that how bad a portfolio can be under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment.Design/methodology/approachIt is strictly proved that the higher the probability threshold, the higher the HVaR in HVaR-S-FPSM. Numerical examples and a case study are used to illustrate the steps of building the proposed models and the importance of the HVaR and score constraint. In case study, the authors conduct a sensitivity analysis and compare the proposed models with decision-making models and hesitant fuzzy portfolio models.FindingsThe score constraint can make sure that the portfolio selected is profitable, but will not cause the HVaR to decrease dramatically. The investment proportions of stocks are mainly affected by their HVaRs, which is consistent with the fact that the stock having good performance is usually desirable in portfolio selection. The HVaR-S-FPSM can find portfolios with higher HVaR than each single stock and has little sacrifice of extreme returns.Originality/valueThis paper fulfills a need to construct portfolio selection models with HVaR under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. As a downside risk, the HVaR is more consistent with investors’ intuitions about risks. Moreover, the score constraint makes sure that undesirable portfolios will not be selected.
Engineering Computations: International Journal for Computer-Aided Engineering and Software – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 30, 2021
Keywords: Extreme big loss; Fuzzy portfolio selection model; Hesitant VaR; Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set; Safety level of score
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.