Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Simon Kattoura, Alexandre Lamoureux, B. Baliga (2013)
A control-volume finite element method for the prediction of three-dimensional diffusion-type phenomena in anisotropic mediaComputational Thermal Sciences, 5
J. Reddy (2019)
A dual mesh finite domain method for the numerical solution of differential equationsInternational Journal for Computational Methods in Engineering Science and Mechanics, 20
Z. Cai, Jim Jones, S. McCormick, T. Russell (1996)
Control‐volume mixed finite element methodsComputational Geosciences, 1
H. Weller (2012)
Controlling the Computational Modes of the Arbitrarily Structured C GridMonthly Weather Review, 140
A. Winslow (1997)
Numerical Solution of the Quasilinear Poisson Equation in a Nonuniform Triangle MeshJournal of Computational Physics, 135
C. Prakash, S. Patankar (1984)
A CONTROL VOLUME-BASED FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD FOR SOLVING THE NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS USING EQUAL-ORDER VELOCITY-PRESSURE INTERPOLATIONNumerical Heat Transfer Part A-applications, 8
B. Baliga, S. Patankar (1980)
A NEW FINITE-ELEMENT FORMULATION FOR CONVECTION-DIFFUSION PROBLEMSNumerical Heat Transfer Part A-applications, 3
B. Baliga, S. Patankar (1983)
A CONTROL VOLUME FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL FLUID FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFERNumerical Heat Transfer Part A-applications, 6
The purpose of this study is to extend a novel numerical method proposed by the first author, known as the dual mesh control domain method (DMCDM), for the solution of linear differential equations to the solution of nonlinear heat transfer and like problems in one and two dimensions.Design/methodology/approachIn the DMCDM, a mesh of finite elements is used for the approximation of the variables and another mesh of control domains for the satisfaction of the governing equation. Both meshes fully cover the domain but the nodes of the finite element mesh are inside the mesh of control domains. The salient feature of the DMCDM is that the concept of duality (i.e. cause and effect) is used to impose boundary conditions. The method possesses some desirable attributes of the finite element method (FEM) and the finite volume method (FVM).FindingsNumerical results show that he DMCDM is more accurate than the FVM for the same meshes used. Also, the DMCDM does not require the use of any ad hoc approaches that are routinely used in the FVM.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, the idea presented in this work is original and novel that exploits the best features of the best competing methods (FEM and FVM). The concept of duality is used to apply gradient and mixed boundary conditions that FVM and its variant do not.
International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 24, 2021
Keywords: Dual mesh finite domain method; Nonlinear convection; The finite element method; The finite volume method
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.