Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Fátima Murta, P. Gama (2021)
Does financial literacy “grease the wheels” of the loans market? A noteStudies in Economics and Finance
A. Lusardi, Olivia Mitchell (2013)
The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and EvidenceMicroeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty eJournal
Journal of Economic Literature, 52
Journal of Monetary Economics, 54
Wei Zhang, Pengfei Wang, Xiao Li, Dehua Shen (2018)
Some stylized facts of the cryptocurrency marketApplied Economics, 50
Economics Letters, 137
Tian Xia, Zhengwei Wang, Kunpeng Li (2014)
Financial Literacy Overconfidence and Stock Market ParticipationSocial Indicators Research, 119
P. Silva, F. Silva (2013)
The market of structured retail products evidence for Portugal
A. Lusardi, O. Mitchell (2006)
Baby Boomer Retirement Security: The Roles of Planning, Financial Literacy, and Housing WealthRI: Retirement Decision-Making (Topic)
A. Lusardi (2019)
Financial literacy and the need for financial education: evidence and implicationsSwiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 155
Johan Almenberg, Anna Dreber (2012)
Gender, Stock Market Participation and Financial LiteracyFinPlanRN: Financial Therapy
Hasanul Banna, Rabiul Alam (2021)
Impact of digital financial inclusion on ASEAN banking stability: implications for the post-Covid-19 eraStudies in Economics and Finance
M. Rooij, A. Lusardi, R. Alessie (2007)
Financial Literacy and Stock Market ParticipationFEN: Behavioral Finance (Topic)
Andrew Karolyi, A. Shleifer, Martha Starr-Mccluer (1999)
BOYS WILL BE BOYS : GENDER , OVERCONFIDENCE , AND COMMON STOCK INVESTMENT
Leora Klapper, A. Lusardi (2020)
Financial literacy and financial resilience: Evidence from around the worldFinancial Management
(2011)
Measuring financial literacy: core questionnaire in measuring financial literacy: questionnaire and guidance notes for conducting an internationally comparable survey of financial literacy
Y. Hsiao, Wei‐Che Tsai (2017)
Financial Literacy and Participation in the Derivatives MarketsDerivatives eJournal
Johan Almenberg, Christer Gerdes (2012)
Exponential growth bias and financial literacyApplied Economics Letters, 19
Journal of Financial Economics, 101
This paper aims to investigate the relationship between perceived and actual financial literacy, among generally literate people, pertaining to market participation and market participation intensity. It examines such market participation in both the traditional segments of the financial markets and the new segments [cryptocurrencies, structured retail products (SRPs) and crowdfunding].Design/methodology/approachThe data are from a survey conducted in 2020 by the Portuguese Securities Commission in cooperation with 12 Portuguese universities. The final sample comprises 2,054 respondents. The basic and advanced financial literacy indexes were calculated following van Rooij et al. (2011). This paper uses probit regressions and ordinary least squares regressions with robust errors.FindingsThis study shows that even highly literate people are influenced by their perceived financial knowledge and its bias toward their actual skills. However, overconfidence has no significant association with securities market participation but rather is marginally correlated with the intensity of such participation. Underconfidence is negatively related to both. Moreover, the relationship between advanced financial literacy and overconfidence pertaining to participation in more complex market segments depends on the product type. Specifically, overconfidence has a positive relationship with participation in cryptocurrencies and SRPs but not with crowdfunding.Research limitations/implicationsThe securities market regulators should take note that participation in some complex market segments, even among literate people, is associated with investor overconfidence. Given that effective financial literacy correlates with participation in some more complex financial market segments and not others, the implication for future research is that the performance of individual investors may differ across these different segments. Additionally, this paper argues that the metrics used to assess financial literacy must take cognizance of the topics required to participate in the new market segments of financial markets.Originality/valueThis paper augments this stream of literature in several respects. First, it focuses on highly educated and trained people rather than the general population. Second, while the previous literature measures market participation using a simple dummy to identify respondents who invest in stocks, this paper also measures the intensity of participation. In addition, this study investigates the financial literacy effect from participation in the more complex segments of the securities markets, as in the case of cryptocurrencies and SRPs.
Studies in Economics and Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 20, 2023
Keywords: Financial literacy; Overconfidence; Market participation; Cryptocurrencies; Financial complex products; Risk attitude; D14; D91; G11
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.