Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Janaina Costa, H. Rozenfeld, C. Amaral, Ricardo Marcacinit, S. Rezende (2013)
Systematization of Recurrent New Product Development Management ProblemsEngineering Management Journal, 25
J. Scoggin, R. Segelhorst, R. Reid (2003)
Applying the TOC thinking process in manufacturing: A case studyInternational Journal of Production Research, 41
Tsu-Ming Yeh, Fan-Yun Pai, Ching-Chow Yang (2008)
Performance improvement in new product development with effective tools and techniques adoption for high-tech industriesQuality & Quantity, 44
R. Reid, J. Cormier (2003)
Applying the TOC TP: a case study in the service sectorManaging Service Quality, 13
eter Trkman (2009)
he critical success factors of business process management
Geert Letens, J. Farris, E. Aken (2011)
A Multilevel Framework for Lean Product Development System DesignEngineering Management Journal, 23
M. Weske, Wil Aalst, H. Verbeek (2004)
Advances in business process managementData Knowl. Eng., 50
J. Sterman, N. Repenning, Fred Kofman (1997)
Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: exploring a paradox of organizational improvementManagement Science, 43
J. Mascarenhas, Hornos Costa, H. Rozenfeld (2007)
Proposal of the BPM method for improving NPD processes 1
Andrea Delgado, B. Weber, F. Ruiz, I. Guzmán, M. Piattini (2014)
An integrated approach based on execution measures for the continuous improvement of business processes realized by servicesInf. Softw. Technol., 56
R. Marcacini, S. Rezende (2010)
Incremental Construction of Topic Hierarchies using Hierarchical Term Clustering
E. Walker, James Cox (2006)
Addressing ill‐structured problems using Goldratt's thinking processesManagement Decision, 44
P. Smart, H. Maddern, R. Maull (2009)
Understanding Business Process Management: Implications for Theory and PracticeInformation Systems & Economics eJournal
N. Malhotra (1993)
Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation
L. Taylor, Becki Murphy, W. Price (2006)
Goldratt's thinking process applied to employee retentionBus. Process. Manag. J., 12
Silvia Pádua, Janaina Costa, Mayara Segatto, Melchior Júnior, C. Jabbour (2014)
BPM for change management: two process diagnosis techniquesBus. Process. Manag. J., 20
Rool Caole (2005)
Root Cause Analysis: A Framework for Tool SelectionQuality Management Journal, 12
J. Nicholas, A. Ledwith, H. Perks (2011)
New product development best practice in SME and large organisations: theory vs practiceEuropean Journal of Innovation Management, 14
S. Rahman (2002)
The theory of constraints' thinking process approach to developing strategies in supply chainsInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32
A. Toni, G. Nassimbeni (2003)
Small and medium district enterprises and the new product development challengeInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23
R. Morais, Samir Kazan, Silvia Pádua, André Costa (2014)
An analysis of BPM lifecycles: from a literature review to a framework proposalBus. Process. Manag. J., 20
David Ford, J. Sterman (2003)
Overcoming the 90% Syndrome: Iteration Management in Concurrent Development ProjectsConcurrent Engineering, 11
Janaina Costa, C. Amaral, H. Rozenfeld (2011)
Proposal of a NPD Diagnostic Method to Identify Improvement Opportunities
V. Grover (1999)
From business reengineering to business process change management: a longitudinal study of trends and practicesIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46
Howard Smith, Peter Fingar (2003)
Business Process Management: The Third Wave
The purpose of this paper is to propose and describe a method that uses recurrent problems to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the diagnosis of new product development (NPD) processes and supports the identification of improvement opportunities. The proposed method, called Diagile, is based on recurrent current reality trees (CRTs) and is a new way of building CRTs that includes best project management practices, and the identification and prioritization of improvement opportunities. To support the execution of the method, recurrent problems were identified and a computational tool to aid the diagnosis, a database of improvement opportunities and an automated spreadsheet to prioritize improvement projects were developed.Design/methodology/approachThe proposed method was evaluated through a controlled experiment at a multinational manufacturer of office supplies.FindingsThe results achieved confirm that the use of the Diagile method increases the diagnostic efficiency and effectiveness when compared to diagnoses performed by the traditional CRT method.Research limitations/implicationsThe validity of the method must be tested on a larger scale, since this work involved only one controlled experiment for this purpose. The experiment involved the participation of postgraduate research assistants, who cannot be considered specialists in the diagnosis of NPD. One could question whether the method will be as helpful for proficient users as well. The authors did not have proficient users available to run the experiment. However, the authors believe that such a specialist would save time in carrying out a diagnosis with Diagile, and also be more effective in validating the diagnosis. However, this assumption could not be tested here and can therefore be considered a limiting factor of the experiment. Nevertheless, the positive results of the evaluations of the companies and users of the two case studies corroborate the statement that the objective of this work was attained.Practical implicationsThe greater efficiency and effectiveness provided by the proposed Diagile method was also evident in the identification and prioritization of improvement opportunities. The experimental group drew up a more relevant and coherent list of improvement projects than the control group, and provided documentation for these projects in the form of project charts. The authors believe these results can be of a great impact if implemented by practitioners.Originality/valueThis paper proposes a new way to perform diagnostic of NPD process. In particular, this process is well known to be highly strategic, nevertheless, normally excluded out of improvement initiatives because of its complexity. The diagnostic method proposed is a powerful tool to assist practitioners finding systemic improvement opportunities, expanding the assessment to all dimensions of a business process, e.g. people, technology and process activities.
Business Process Management Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 18, 2019
Keywords: New product development; Current reality tree
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.