Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Rousseau (1997)
Sitations: an exploratory study
P. Ingwersen (1998)
The calculation of web impact factorsJ. Documentation, 54
S. Lawrence, C. Giles (1999)
Accessibility of information on the webNature, 400
Paul Kim, T. Eng, M. Deering, A. Maxfield (1999)
Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: reviewBMJ, 318
H. Sandvik (1999)
Health information and interaction on the internet: a survey of female urinary incontinenceBMJ, 319
G. Eysenbach, T. Diepgen (1998)
Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information.BMJ, 317
S. Darmoni, V. Leroux, B. Thirion, P. Santamaria, M. Daigne, C.Duvaux, O. Dubois, J. Santoni, M. Gea (1997)
NetScoring : critères de qualité de l'information de santé sur l'Internet
W. Silberg, G. Lundberg, R. Musacchio (1997)
Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor--Let the reader and viewer beware.JAMA, 277 15
Although the Internet is already a valuable information resource in medicine, there are important challenges to be faced before physicians and general users will have extensive access to this information. As a result of a research effort to compile a health‐related Internet directory, new tools and strategies have been developed to solve key problems derived from the explosive growth of medical information on the Net and the great concern over the quality of such critical information. The current Internet search engines lack some important capabilities. We suggest using second generation tools (client‐side based) able to deal with large quantities of data and to increase the usability of the records recovered. We tested the capabilities of these programs to solve health‐related information problems, recognising six groups according to the kind of topics addressed: Z39.50 clients, downloaders, multisearchers, tracing agents, indexers and mappers. The evaluation of the quality of health information available on the Internet could require a large amount of human effort. A possible solution may be to use quantitative indicators based on the hypertext visibility of the Web sites. The cybermetric measures are valid for quality evaluation if they are derived from indirect peer review by experts with Web pages citing the site. The hypertext links acting as citations need to be extracted from a controlled sample of quality super‐sites.
Online Information Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 2000
Keywords: Information retrieval; Internet; Health care; Information services; Quality control; Evaluation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.