Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Cole, P. Kernan (1996)
Life-cycle energy use in office buildingsBuilding and Environment, 31
P. Crowther (1999)
Design for Disassembly to Recover Embodied Energy
Modern Steel Construction
P. Maydl (2004)
Sustainable Engineering: State-of-the-Art and ProspectsStructural Engineering International, 14
Environmental Science & Technology, 44
Hamer Center
J. Ochsendorf (2005)
Sustainable Engineering: The Future of Structural Design
A. Dessouki, A. Youssef, M. Ibrahim (2013)
Behavior of I-beam bolted extended end-plate moment connectionsAin Shams Engineering Journal, 4
Joseph Danatzko, H. Sezen (2011)
Sustainable Structural Design MethodologiesPractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 16
Newsteelconstructioncom
PurposeIn seismic-prone areas, post-event operability is an important issue for steel warehouses. Even if surviving earthquakes with minimal probability of collapse, these structures might suffer so much damage, that their repair costs would be prohibitive. Strategies for limiting the building's damaged zones to specific parts (or “fuses”) can reduce repair costs. However, the replaceable part is limited to a small portion of the structure, whereas the rest cannot be disassembled. This is an issue for structures whose life span depends more likely on economics rather than on structural performances. Therefore, making them easily disassembled would be an advantage not only in seismic areas but also in any industrialized area. The purpose of this paper is to explore the “Design for Disassembly” (DfD) approach to complement seismic design and find a compromise between them.Design/methodology/approachIn this work, one single type of structures was analysed (the moment-resisting frame), focusing on the design of a “disassemblable” seismic-resistant steel connection. The design process involved several iterations until an “optimum” compromise between seismic design and DfD was met.FindingsThis study shows that a compromise between seismic design and DfD is possible. In this case, the compromise was achieved at the expenses of more complex design calculations and a greater number of components than standard connections. However, this would be compensated for by a higher residual value for the entire structure.Originality/valueEventually, it was proved that a metric for assessing DfD steel connections is possible, but structural analyses are needed to validate it.
International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 12, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.