Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Yoshida, S. Murata, A. Kamimura, K. Tomita, H. Kurokawa, S. Kokaji (2002)
A Self-Reconfigurable Modular Robot: Reconfiguration Planning and ExperimentsThe International Journal of Robotics Research, 21
S.K. Fixson
The multiple faces of modularity – an analysis of a product concept for assembled hardware products
G. Hamlin, A. Sanderson (1996)
TETROBOT modular robotics: prototype and experimentsProceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IROS '96, 2
G. Hirzinger, N. Sporer, A. Albu-Schäffer, M. Hähnle, R. Krenn, A. Pascucci, M. Schedl (2002)
DLR's torque-controlled light weight robot III-are we reaching the technological limits now?Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292), 2
D. Rus, C. McGray
Self‐reconfigurable modular as 3D‐metamorphic robots
G. Hirzinger, K. Landzettel, B. Brunner, M. Fischer, C. Preusche, D. Reintsema, A. Albu-Schäffer, G. Schreiber, B. Steinmetz (2004)
DLR's robotics technologies for on-orbit servicingAdvanced Robotics, 18
Mark Yim, Kimon Roufas, D. Duff, Y. Zhang, Craig Eldershaw, Samuel Homans (2003)
Modular Reconfigurable Robots in Space ApplicationsAutonomous Robots, 14
C.Y. Baldwin, K.B. Clark
Design rules
G. Casalino, A. Turetta (2005)
A Computationally Distributed Self-Organizing Algorithm for the Control of Manipulators in the Operational SpaceProceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
D. Sanders (2009)
Analysis of the effects of time delays on the teleoperation of a mobile robot in various modes of operationInd. Robot, 36
J. Dahmus, J. Gonzalez-Zugasti, K. Otto (2001)
Modular product architectureDesign Studies, 22
B. Wilhelm (1997)
Platform and Modular Concepts at Volkswagen — Their Effects on the Assembly Process
G. Casalino, A. Turetta, A. Sorbara (2006)
OPERATIONAL SPACE CONTROL OF COMPLEX MODULAR ROBOTIC STRUCTURES VIA DP BASED KINEMATIC INVERSION TECHNIQUESIFAC Proceedings Volumes, 39
G.D. Galsworth
Smart Simple Design
P. Jantapremjit, D. Austin (2001)
Design of a Modular Self-Reconfigurable Robot
Chun-Che Huang, A. Kusiak (1998)
Modularity in design of products and systemsIEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A, 28
F. Xi, You-Nan Xu, G. Xiong (2006)
Design and analysis of a re-configurable parallel robotMechanism and Machine Theory, 41
S. Murata, E. Yoshida, K. Tomita, H. Kurokawa, A. Kamimura, S. Kokaji (2000)
Hardware design of modular robotic systemProceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113), 3
Carliss Baldwin, K. Clark (2000)
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity
R. Stone, K. Wood, R. Crawford (2000)
A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architecturesDesign Studies, 21
K‐H. Wurst, U. Peting
PKM concept for reconfigurable machine‐tools
Mark Yim, D. Duff, Kimon Roufas (2000)
PolyBot: a modular reconfigurable robotProceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065), 1
D. Sanders (2009)
Comparing speed to complete progressively more difficult mobile robot paths between human tele‐operators and humans with sensor‐systems to assistAssembly Automation, 29
Purpose – The aim of this paper is the development of a modular robotic system for generic industrial applications, including assembly. Design/methodology/approach – A library of robotic modules has been designed; they are divided into two categories: link modules, not actuated, and joint modules, actuated; the library is characterized by a relatively low number of elements, but allows the assembly of a wide variety of medium‐size serial robots. Findings – The prototypes of two joint modules (a revolute joint module and a wrist module) and of some link modules have been realized. The behaviour of several serial robots composed of the designed modules has been assessed by multibody simulation. The results confirm the goodness of the proposed approach. Research limitations/implications – The two prototype modules are under test in combination with simplified modules. The further steps of the research programme will be the completion of the prototype library, and an experimental campaign on different serial chains. Practical implications – Modularity allows one to achieve a great variety of robots starting from a small set of modules, in order to match different operative requirements. Moreover, modularity dramatically reduces the time‐to‐repair of the robot and consequently improves its overall availability; this is a fundamental feature for modern industrial enterprises aiming at maximizing the resources availability. Originality/value – The proposed mechanical design of the revolute joint modules, based on a harmonic drive that connects two bodies in relative rotational motion, is compact and robust. Modularity is not restricted to mechanics: a distributed control system is adopted to make the reconfiguration of the robot easier and quicker.
Assembly Automation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 18, 2008
Keywords: Assembly; Robotics; Production methods
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.