Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Hofstede (1983)
National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research-Based Theory of Cultural Differences among NationsInternational Studies of Management and Organization, 13
S. Zahra, Carol Hansen (2000)
PRIVATIZATION, ENTREPRENEURSHIP, AND GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS IN THE 21st CENTURYCompetitiveness Review: An International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 10
Prasad Oswal., Winfried Ruigrok, N. Agrawal (2014)
Acquiring Firm-Specific Advantages: Organizational Innovation and Internationalization at Indian Multinational Corporations, 15
Said Elfakhani, Wayne Mackie (2015)
An analysis of net FDI drivers in BRIC countries, 25
Competitiveness Review, 18
Roger Martin, R. Florida, Melissa Pogue, C. Mellander (2015)
Creativity, clusters and the competitive advantage of cities, 25
HSM Management, 15
R. Jenkins (2012)
China and Brazil: Economic Impacts of a Growing RelationshipJournal of Current Chinese Affairs, 41
T. Wood, M. Caldas (2007)
Empresas brasileiras e o desafio da competitividadeRae-revista De Administracao De Empresas, 47
Harvard Business Review, 90
J. Kunnanatt (2011)
Global business chain and twin advantage: Strategic opportunities for developing countriesCompetitiveness Review: An International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 21
A. Rugman, Jing Li (2007)
Will China’s Multinationals Succeed Globally or Regionally?European Management Journal, 25
Departamento Ciesp (1991)
A informação para o setor industrial no Brasil: a participação do Departamento (Detec) da Federação e centro das indústrias do Estado de São Paulo (Fiesp/Ciesp)*, 20
R. Jenkins (2014)
Chinese Competition and Brazilian Exports of ManufacturesOxford Development Studies, 42
R. Fischer, A. Chalmers (2008)
Is optimism universal? A meta-analytical investigation of optimism levels across 22 nations.Personality and Individual Differences, 45
A. Musacchio, S. Lazzarini (2014)
Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond
Edward Shaffer, A. Rugman, I. Litvak, C. Maule (1982)
Inside the Multinationals, the Economics of Internal Markets@@@The Canadian MultinationalsCanadian Public Policy-analyse De Politiques, 8
G. Lanzolla, Jaime Anderson (2010)
Secretos de la convergenciaHSM Management, 15
PurposeThis study aims to examine the competitiveness of firms operating in the emerging economy of Brazil. This study examines the current perception of Brazilian business leaders regarding the level of competitiveness in various sectors of industrial activity and the country’s business environment.Design/methodology/approachSurvey data were collected in a joint study developed by Brazilian School of Public and Business Administration (EBAPE) and the Brazilian Institute of Economics (IBRE). The population surveyed was composed of businessmen, managers and directors of Brazilian manufacturing firms. This survey was created based on a similar survey conducted by the Harvard Business School, which was also aimed at identifying the reasons behind national loss of competitiveness.FindingsThe results of the survey point out that the worsening competitive nature of companies operating in Brazil can be primarily attributed to the deterioration of its country-specific advantages and in particular those linked to government policies, services and bureaucratic procedures, all of which bear a negative impact on the country’s business environment.Research limitations/implicationsFuture research should explore in more depth the specific types of initiatives that these firms have and are continuing to eagerly adopt with the aim of improving their domestic competitiveness and, namely, firm-specific advantages, whether it be by contributing to the improvement of the business environment as a whole, or by improving their own operations and management systems.Practical implicationsThe main obstacles related to competitiveness are associated with the “Brazil Cost”, namely, the tax system, infrastructure, political system, labor laws and bureaucracy that do not appear to offer much room for maneuvering in terms of reducing these barriers in the short term. Managers not addressing these important input factors of competitiveness not only divert attention away from innovation and creativity but also could lead to more serious political, social welfare and economic implications in the global marketplace.Social implicationsThis study helps to gain a better understanding of the initiatives that could and are being used to contribute to a fruitful discussion about leading public policies and government actions geared toward upgrading Brazil’s business environment and country competitiveness as a whole.Originality/valueThis research contributes to the understanding of the initiatives that could and are being used to improve firm competitiveness in Brazil. These initiatives contribute to a fruitful discussion about leading public policies and government actions geared toward upgrading Brazil’s business environment and country competitiveness as a whole.
Competitiveness Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 15, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.