Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Hensler, R. Edgeman, José-Luis Guerrero-Cusumano (2000)
East meets West: Weaving the threads of Deming, da Vinci and the Tao Te ChingTotal Quality Management, 11
Gary Klein (2017)
Sources of Power: How People Make DecisionsLeadership and Management in Engineering, 1
R. Frosch (2000)
Learning from Lao Tzu: A Leadership PrimerResearch-Technology Management, 43
Jerald Greenberg (1998)
Managing Behavior in Organizations
B. Boar (1995)
Planning Theory: Sun Tzu and Machiavelli On StrategyJournal of Business Strategy, 16
D. Power, Ramon Aldag (1985)
Soelberg's Job Search and Choice Model: A Clarification, Review, and CritiqueAcademy of Management Review, 10
H. Simon (1986)
Rationality in Psychology and EconomicsThe Journal of Business, 59
R. Katz (2009)
Skills of an Effective Administrator
Y. Wong, Thomas Maher, George Lee (1998)
The Strategy of an Ancient Warrior: An Inspiration for International ManagersThe Multinational Business Review, 6
J. Forester (1984)
Bounded Rationality and the Politics of Muddling ThroughPublic Administration Review, 44
H. Simon (1987)
Making Management Decisions: the Role of Intuition and EmotionAcademy of Management Executive, 1
E. Harrison (1975)
The managerial decision-making process
B. Boar
Sun Tzu and Machiavelli on strategy
C. Rarick (1996)
Ancient Chinese Advice for Modern Business StrategistsSAM Advanced Management Journal, 61
O. Behling, Norman Eckel (1991)
Making sense out of intuitionThe Executive, 5
J.W. Bowers
Content analysis
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine the value of I‐Ching (also called Book of Changes ), the ancient Chinese book of wisdom, which has been used for thousands of years to help people make decisions in daily life. Recently, eastern and western scholars have begun discussing how to apply the wisdom of I‐Ching to the field of business administration, particularly decision‐making practices. Design/methodology/approach – A content analysis method was adopted to uncover possible modern management decision‐making constructs. The single words approach did not find frequently appearing words that integrated decision‐making constructs in the context of I‐Ching . Further uncovering I‐Ching 's administrative decision‐making approach, the managerial decision‐making model of I‐Ching is explained, including the premises, the decision contingencies, and the decision process. Findings – By using an academic comparative analysis method, as it applies to managerial decision making, I‐Ching 's early management decision‐making model is subsequently compared with western management decision models, which include rational decision making, bounded‐rationality decision making, intuitive decision making, implicit favorite decision making, and garbage‐can decision making. Research limitations/implications – The majority of scholars that study I‐Ching focus on “practice divination” research, paying attention to the interpretation or critique of the text only. Unfortunately, related literature based upon a social science research foundation is limited. Originality/value – The value of I‐Ching was determined to lie in allowing flexibility in the decision‐making process.
Chinese Management Studies – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 11, 2008
Keywords: Managers; Decision making; China; Business administration; Oriental philosophy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.