Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Michael Kouparitsas (2001)
Is the United States an Optimum Currency Area? An Empirical Analysis of Regional Business CyclesMacroeconomics eJournal
Barry Eichengreen, D. Irwin (1995)
Trade blocs, currency blocs and the reorientation of world trade in the 1930sJournal of International Economics, 38
A. Hallett, L. Piscitelli (2002)
Does One Size Fit All? A currency union with asymmetric transmissions and a stability pactInternational Review of Applied Economics, 16
(1999)
Exchange Rates and Financial Fragility
C. Bergsten, Y. Park (2002)
Toward Creating a Regional Monetary Arrangement in East Asia
C. Meissner (2003)
Exchange-Rate Regimes and International Trade: Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard EraThe American Economic Review, 93
O. Bacha (2008)
A common currency area for ASEAN? issues and feasibilityApplied Economics, 40
Should MENA Countries Float or Peg? Finance & Development, IMF Publications
A. Rose (2000)
One Market: The Effect of Common Currencies on Trade
M. Flandreau, M. Maurel
Monetary Union, Trade Integration, and Business Cycles in 19th Century Europe: Just Do It
Marc Flandreau, M. Maurel (2001)
Monetary Union, Trade Integration, and Business Cycles in 19th Century EuropeOpen Economies Review, 16
M. Al-Jasser, Abdulrahman Al-Hamidy (2003)
A common currency area for the Gulf region, 17
S. Schadler (2004)
Charting a Course Toward Successful Euro Adoption Newest EU entrants should reap net gains from joining the euro area
(2004)
Optimum Currency Area: Euro as a Practical Paradigm? Global Financial Markets -Issues and Strategies
A. Alesina, R.J. Barro, S. Tenreyo
Optimal Currency Areas
B. Kamar (2004)
De Facto Exchange Rate Policies in the MENA Region: Toward Deeper Cooperation
B. Eichengreen, D. Irwin
Journal of International Economics
Michael Kouparitsas (1999)
Is the EMU a viable common currency area? a VAR analysis of regional business cyclesEconomic Perspectives, 23
M. Kawai (1991)
Optimum Currency Areas
Grace Lee, M. Azali (2009)
Optimum Currency Areas in East Asia: A Structural VAR Approach
Y. Park (2002)
Prospects for Financial Integration and Exchange Rate Policy Cooperation in East Asia
O. Blanchard, D. Quah (1988)
The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply DisturbancesMacroeconomics eJournal
A. Rose (1999)
One Money, One Market: Estimating the Effect of Common Currencies on TradeInternational Trade eJournal
P. Grauwe, Frauke Skudelny (2000)
The impact of EMU on trade flowsWeltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 136
Hazel Ling (2001)
Optimum Currency Areas in East Asia A Structural VAR ApproachJournal of Southeast Asian Economies, 18
J. Frankel, S. Wei (1992)
Yen Bloc or Dollar Bloc: Exchange Rate Policies of the East Asian Economies
R. Mundell (1961)
A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas
M. Nabli, Marie-Ange * (2004)
How does exchange rate policy affect manufactured exports in MENA countries?Applied Economics, 36
P.B. Kennen
The theory of optimum currency areas: an eclectic view
W. Enders (1994)
Applied Econometric Time SeriesTechnometrics, 46
J. Frankel, A. Rose (2000)
An Estimate of the Effect of Currency Unions on Trade and Output
Purpose – This paper aims to examine the feasibility of a Common Currency Area (CCA) among ten MENA (Middle East and North Africa) Countries. The ten sample countries constitute the six GCC Countries and the four Agadir nations. Design/methodology/approach – Macroeconomic data for the 34‐year‐period 1970‐2003 is used. Feasibility is examined by analyzing the symmetry of response of countries within each group to a common external shock. The impulse response functions (IRF) from a Vector Autoregression Model is used. The strength of linkages within each economic bloc was examined using Pearson pairwise correlation and variance decomposition. Findings – Among GCC countries, the results show the existence of strong linkages among the monetary variables, signifying strong monetary sector integration. Such integration however is lacking where the real sector is concerned. Despite the symmetry seen in the impulse response functions, variance decomposition showed the absence of any meaningful influence of countries on each other within the bloc. Amongst the Agadir nations, the results show no correlation in real output growth, some correlation among monetary variables but no symmetry whatsoever in response to external shocks. The variance decomposition too did not show mutual influence intra group. Practical implications – The lack of real sector integration will present a challenge to GCC's desired goal of a CCA by 2010. The Agadir nations appear to be simply a loosely knit economic grouping with little integration of any kind. Thus, hopes of a CCA among Agadir nations is far too premature. Originality/value – The paper concludes that the GCC is, at present, a quasi‐monetary bloc with little real sector integration.
International Journal of Emerging Markets – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 11, 2008
Keywords: Currencies; North Africa; Middle East
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.