Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

A case study on fraudulent financial reporting: evidence from Malaysia

A case study on fraudulent financial reporting: evidence from Malaysia PurposeThis paper aims to examine cases of fraudulent financial reporting (FFR) which were subject to published enforcement actions by the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) from 1998 to 2012 for reasons of alleged financial misreporting. It investigates the main attempts used (how) and sensible motives (why) for these fraudulent reporting.Design/methodology/approachThis study undertakes a close examination of the financial reports manipulated – annual accounts, interim reports and financial reports in listing proposals, initial public offering prospectuses and corporate restructuring proposals. Due to the limited number of FFR published, a close examination of these cases is the best way to reach a more comprehensive and detailed understanding of “how” FFR takes place, rather than performing large sample statistical analyses. This study also collects data which provide evidence for the possible motivations in resorting to the FFR.FindingsThe most common attempt used by the sample companies was to overstate their reported revenue by recognising fictitious sales from bogus customers. Sample companies who attempted this initial manipulation often followed with consequential manipulations and in some cases also embarked on masking manipulations. Sensible motives for the sample companies to manipulate their financial statements include capital raising exercises, closeness to defaulting on debt repayments and sustaining equity overvaluations.Research limitations/implicationsThe primary limitation of this study is its lack of breadth due to the limited number of reported cases available. Moreover, taking the sample companies used from enforcement action releases published by the SC presupposes that the SC has diligently and correctly identified all the FFR cases – whereas there is a possibility that some companies involved in FFR may not yet have been detected or publicly revealed. Notwithstanding these limitations, our findings provide a comprehensive insight, which is sufficient in depth, into the operational aspects of FFR in Malaysia.Practical implicationsOne practical lesson from the findings on “how” within the chain of manipulations is that auditors ought to review the effectiveness of their analytical and substantive procedures, as a number of the FFR cases remained undetected by the audit process. A second is that accounting standards setters may wish to reconsider the amount of discretion given to managers in financial reporting. On the one hand, some managers have used this discretion to provide useful information to the market; however, others have opportunistically used it for personal gain.Social implicationsFrom the societal perspective, it is time for managers, as agents of capital providers, to self-review their responsibilities and stewardship in financial reporting. There needs to be a paradigm shift in their attitudes towards the perceived incentives of, and opportunities for, FFR. Managers’ wrongdoings in these accounting scandals have had significant adverse consequences for society – including minority shareholders, investor confidence, future accountants and managers in the making.Originality/valueThis study provides direct and practical evidence on the “how” and “why” of FFR in the context of a developing country – Malaysia. Such evidence is limited in the existing literature and relevant to practitioners. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Accounting Research Journal Emerald Publishing

A case study on fraudulent financial reporting: evidence from Malaysia

Lau, Chee Kwong; Ooi, Ki Wei
Accounting Research Journal , Volume 29 (1): 16 – May 3, 2016
Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/a-case-study-on-fraudulent-financial-reporting-evidence-from-malaysia-tKFE6x4mF5
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1030-9616
DOI
10.1108/ARJ-11-2013-0084
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to examine cases of fraudulent financial reporting (FFR) which were subject to published enforcement actions by the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) from 1998 to 2012 for reasons of alleged financial misreporting. It investigates the main attempts used (how) and sensible motives (why) for these fraudulent reporting.Design/methodology/approachThis study undertakes a close examination of the financial reports manipulated – annual accounts, interim reports and financial reports in listing proposals, initial public offering prospectuses and corporate restructuring proposals. Due to the limited number of FFR published, a close examination of these cases is the best way to reach a more comprehensive and detailed understanding of “how” FFR takes place, rather than performing large sample statistical analyses. This study also collects data which provide evidence for the possible motivations in resorting to the FFR.FindingsThe most common attempt used by the sample companies was to overstate their reported revenue by recognising fictitious sales from bogus customers. Sample companies who attempted this initial manipulation often followed with consequential manipulations and in some cases also embarked on masking manipulations. Sensible motives for the sample companies to manipulate their financial statements include capital raising exercises, closeness to defaulting on debt repayments and sustaining equity overvaluations.Research limitations/implicationsThe primary limitation of this study is its lack of breadth due to the limited number of reported cases available. Moreover, taking the sample companies used from enforcement action releases published by the SC presupposes that the SC has diligently and correctly identified all the FFR cases – whereas there is a possibility that some companies involved in FFR may not yet have been detected or publicly revealed. Notwithstanding these limitations, our findings provide a comprehensive insight, which is sufficient in depth, into the operational aspects of FFR in Malaysia.Practical implicationsOne practical lesson from the findings on “how” within the chain of manipulations is that auditors ought to review the effectiveness of their analytical and substantive procedures, as a number of the FFR cases remained undetected by the audit process. A second is that accounting standards setters may wish to reconsider the amount of discretion given to managers in financial reporting. On the one hand, some managers have used this discretion to provide useful information to the market; however, others have opportunistically used it for personal gain.Social implicationsFrom the societal perspective, it is time for managers, as agents of capital providers, to self-review their responsibilities and stewardship in financial reporting. There needs to be a paradigm shift in their attitudes towards the perceived incentives of, and opportunities for, FFR. Managers’ wrongdoings in these accounting scandals have had significant adverse consequences for society – including minority shareholders, investor confidence, future accountants and managers in the making.Originality/valueThis study provides direct and practical evidence on the “how” and “why” of FFR in the context of a developing country – Malaysia. Such evidence is limited in the existing literature and relevant to practitioners.

Journal

Accounting Research Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 3, 2016

References

  • Overvaluation and the choice of alternative earnings management mechanisms
  • Market and political/regulatory perspectives on the recent accounting scandals
  • Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries
  • Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanism
  • Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting
  • Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients
  • Factors affecting internal auditors’ consideration of fraudulent financial reporting during analytical procedures
  • Earnings management: reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators
  • Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC
  • Predicting material accounting manipulations
  • Accounting irregularities, management compensation structure and information asymmetry
  • Cooking the books: recipes and costs of falsified financial statements in China
  • An overview of accounting restatement activity in the United States
  • What do we know about audit quality?
  • Accounting choices of issuers of initial public offerings
  • CFO intentions of fraudulent financial reporting
  • Auditors’ response to political connections and cronyism in Malaysia
  • Management motive, weak governance, earnings management, and fraudulent financial reporting: Malaysian evidence
  • Financial statement fraud: insights from the academic literature