Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Spinuzzi (2005)
The Methodology of Participatory DesignTechnical Communication, 52
(2015)
Phishing in Jamtara: What Does it Take to Carry Out Online Fraud? The Indian Express
P. Duquenoy, H. Thimbleby (1999)
Justice and Design
Houston Law Review, 55
W. Lam (2010)
Governing the Commons
C. Carter (2013)
The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future
Gillian Hayes (2011)
The relationship of action research to human-computer interactionACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact., 18
Mattered Schumacher (1974)
Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered
(2020)
Ethics in Applied Computer Science. Course contents, IIT Delhi, available at: http://bit.ly/2FARXrs
(2010)
Ethics After the Information Revolution
A. Waldman (2017)
Designing Without PrivacyLegal Perspectives in Information Systems eJournal
D. Berdichevsky, Erik Neunschwander (1999)
Toward an ethics of persuasive technologyCommun. ACM, 42
S. Rogerson (2017)
Coding ethics into technologyHack and Craft News, 3 July, Additional reporting by Chris Middleton
Communications of the ACM, 61
L. Suchman (2002)
Located Accountabilities in Technology ProductionScand. J. Inf. Syst., 14
(1980)
Do artefacts have politics
Aaditeshwar Seth (2019)
A New Paradigm to Accommodate Ethical Foundations in the Design and Management of Digital Platforms
C. Nuesse (1952)
The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society
(2018)
Workers at Google, Amazon, and Microsoft
A. Chouldechova, A. Roth (2018)
The frontiers of fairness in machine learning. CCC (computing community consortium) Workshop report
(2018)
Declaration on ethics and data protection in artificial intelligence
(2019)
Dissent on Aadhaar: Big Data Meets Big Brother. Orient Blackswan, India
T. Doyle (2017)
Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens DemocracyThe Information Society, 33
Casey Fiesler, Natalie Garrett, Nathan Beard (2020)
What Do We Teach When We Teach Tech Ethics?: A Syllabi AnalysisProceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
(2018)
Why German Corporate Boards Include Workers
Bo Dahlbom, L. Mathiassen (1997)
The future of our professionCommun. ACM, 40
F. Berman, Rob Rutenbar, B. Hailpern, Henrik Christensen, S. Davidson, D. Estrin, Michael Franklin, M. Martonosi, Padma Raghavan, V. Stodden, A. Szalay (2018)
Realizing the potential of data scienceCommunications of the ACM, 61
M. Cooley (2016)
Architect or Bee?: The Human Price of Technology
R. Hirschheim, H. Klein (1989)
Four paradigms of information systems developmentCommun. ACM, 32
(2015)
Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT
Anirban Sen, Priya Chhillar, Pooja Aggarwal, Sravan Verma, Debanjan Ghatak, P. Kumari, Manpreet Agandh, Aditya Guru, Aaditeshwar Seth (2019)
An attempt at using mass media data to analyze the political economy around some key ICTD policies in IndiaProceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
A. Chouldechova, Aaron Roth (2018)
The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine LearningArXiv, abs/1810.08810
(2018)
Techlash: Why Facebook's Approach to #FakeNews Ultimately Fails
Muskaan, M.P. Dhaliwal, A. Seth (2019)
Fairness and diversity in the recommendation and ranking of participatory media contentKDD Workshop on Intelligent Information Feeds, August 2019
L. Sanders (2008)
ON MODELINGAn evolving map of design practice and design researchInteractions, 15
(2016)
The Real Bias Built In at Facebook
Batya Friedman, P. Kahn, A. Borning, A. Huldtgren (2020)
Value Sensitive Design and Information SystemsThe Ethics of Information Technologies
Dion Dennis (1998)
Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have FailedClassical Antiquity, 20
C. Huff (2006)
Craft and Reform in Moral Exemplars in Computing
Jeffrey Mermelstein (2014)
The future of our profession.Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association, 85 3
Coding Ethics Into Technology. Hack & Craft News
Aaditeshwar Seth (2020)
The Limits of Design in Ensuring Responsible Outcomes from TechnologyProceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
Mark Oakley (1988)
Architect or BeeJournal of Design History, 1
P. Adler (1990)
Marx, Machines, and SkillTechnology and Culture, 31
Shoshana Zuboff (2019)
The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power
E. Mumford, Maria Weir (1979)
Computer systems in work design--the ETHICS method : effective technical and human implementation of computer systems
H. Toutenburg (1982)
The Social Control of TechnologyJournal of the Operational Research Society
D. Harvey (2003)
The Fetish of Technology: Causes and ConsequencesMacalester International, 13
D.S. Edmund (2015)
Phishing in Jamtara: what does it take to carry out online fraud?The Indian Express
Bo Dahlbom, L. Mathiassen (1993)
Computers in Context : The Philosophy and Practice of Systems DesignSocial Science Computer Review, 12
Markus Weinmann, C. Schneider, J. Brocke (2016)
Digital NudgingBusiness & Information Systems Engineering, 58
Muskaan, Mehak Dhaliwal, Aaditeshwar Seth (2019)
Fairness and diversity in the recommendation and ranking of participatory media contentProceedings of the 2021 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
Anirban Sen, A. Agarwal, Aditya Guru, A. Choudhuri, G. Singh, I. Mohammed, J. Goyal, K. Mittal, Manpreet Singh, M. Goel, S. Gupta, S. Pathak, Varuni Madapur, Aaditeshwar Seth (2018)
Leveraging Web Data to Monitor Changes in Corporate-Government Interlocks in IndiaProceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
(2021)
White-collar unions and attitudes towards income inequality, redistribution, and state-market relations
A.F. Campbell (2018)
Workers at Google, Amazon, and Microsoft are demanding input on the impact of the technology they build. Vox
(2018)
In Ranchi's Nagri Block, Ration Rice Comes at a Heavy Price
The purpose of this paper is to encourage technologists, those who design and manage technology systems, to collectivize and get closely involved in defining the priorities of their organizations, their countries, and the world, so that responsible outcomes can arise from their labour.Design/methodology/approachThe author examines this problem from three viewpoints: From a design perspective about what is missing in most design practices to build information systems that undesirable outcomes still happen; from an ethics perspective about how to incorporate values in building and managing information systems; and from a political economy perspective about why ensuring responsible outcomes from technology is not easy. The author describes several limitations faced by technologists in achieving this, ranging from gaps in the design methods in use currently, a piecemeal approach to following ethical principles in the design and management of technologies, influence of the organizational culture and structure and the wider political economy of technology itself.FindingsThe author suggests several measures to address these challenges and conclude with a call to technologists to collectivize and engage politically to influence their organizations and governments to invest in meaningful objectives for a just and equitable world, and design and manage the solutions in ethically consistent ways.Research limitations/implicationsIt is argued that a new paradigm of information systems is needed for digital platforms, which is grounded in ethics-based guidelines that should be followed by the designers and managers of these platforms to help ensure responsible outcomes.Practical implicationsHaving such a paradigm is especially important in today’s winner-takes-all digital platform era because these platforms are governed by only a few people; therefore, it is imperative to build guardrails to responsibly manage these platforms, and to have technologists who design and manage these platforms to play a role in their governance.Social implicationsInformation systems have the potential to alter power relationships in society, and it is suggested that they should be designed to empower the weak.Originality/valueTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this is a unique perspective that draws from his personal experience as a researcher and practitioner designing technologies for social good, and examines the problem from many different viewpoints.
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 4, 2021
Keywords: Political economy; Social development; Design; Deployment; Technology workers; Ethics; Responsibility
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.