Workshop on Comparison of Forest-Soil-Atmosphere Models: Preface

Workshop on Comparison of Forest-Soil-Atmosphere Models: Preface Between 10 and 14 May 1993, a workshop was organized in Leusden, the Netherlands, in which the concepts and performance of 18 models were discussed. These models were generally aimed at the analysis of effects of acid atmospheric deposition on forest and forest soils. Model concepts were analysed by means of a questionnaire. Model performance was analysed by application of the models to a common dataset for the F1 Norway spruce site, at Solling, for the period 1970–1990. The nature of the participating models varied widely, but all models were process-oriented and dynamic. Included were hydrological models, soil chemistry models as well as integrated models for calculation of forest growth. Overall, average annual hydrology, soil solution chemistry and forest growth of the spruce site between 1970–1990 could be reproduced. Differences between models were attributable more to different parameterizations than to differences of model concepts. Short-term temporal dynamics of soil solution chemistry were not reproduced very well, particularly for nitrate. Models also gave different predictions of the response of the Norway spruce to maintained or reduced fluxes of atmospheric deposition, however, confirming a key role for Mg and N. Complex models did not give better results than more simple models. Integrated models were also judged unbalanced, with respect to description of the hydrologic, soil chemical and forest subsystems. Therefore, it was recommended to improve this balance and to work towards less complex models for prediction of the long-term behaviour of forest stands. Our knowledge about nutrient uptake by forests in nutrient-limited acidified soil systems, and also about the interaction of various forest stresses is still inadequate. Future research should therefore emphasize a better integration of model development and experimental research, e.g., as presently is the case for experimental field manipulations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Ecological Modelling Elsevier

Workshop on Comparison of Forest-Soil-Atmosphere Models: Preface

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/workshop-on-comparison-of-forest-soil-atmosphere-models-preface-8390jf60Aj
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0304-3800
eISSN
1872-7026
D.O.I.
10.1016/0304-3800(95)00078-A
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Between 10 and 14 May 1993, a workshop was organized in Leusden, the Netherlands, in which the concepts and performance of 18 models were discussed. These models were generally aimed at the analysis of effects of acid atmospheric deposition on forest and forest soils. Model concepts were analysed by means of a questionnaire. Model performance was analysed by application of the models to a common dataset for the F1 Norway spruce site, at Solling, for the period 1970–1990. The nature of the participating models varied widely, but all models were process-oriented and dynamic. Included were hydrological models, soil chemistry models as well as integrated models for calculation of forest growth. Overall, average annual hydrology, soil solution chemistry and forest growth of the spruce site between 1970–1990 could be reproduced. Differences between models were attributable more to different parameterizations than to differences of model concepts. Short-term temporal dynamics of soil solution chemistry were not reproduced very well, particularly for nitrate. Models also gave different predictions of the response of the Norway spruce to maintained or reduced fluxes of atmospheric deposition, however, confirming a key role for Mg and N. Complex models did not give better results than more simple models. Integrated models were also judged unbalanced, with respect to description of the hydrologic, soil chemical and forest subsystems. Therefore, it was recommended to improve this balance and to work towards less complex models for prediction of the long-term behaviour of forest stands. Our knowledge about nutrient uptake by forests in nutrient-limited acidified soil systems, and also about the interaction of various forest stresses is still inadequate. Future research should therefore emphasize a better integration of model development and experimental research, e.g., as presently is the case for experimental field manipulations.

Journal

Ecological ModellingElsevier

Published: Dec 1, 1995

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off