Using heterogeneity and representation of ecosite criteria to select forest reserves in an intensively managed industrial forest

Using heterogeneity and representation of ecosite criteria to select forest reserves in an... The 189,000 ha privately owned, industrial Black Brook District in New Brunswick, Canada, contains 27 forest reserve areas, totaling 9500 ha (5%), with a primary management strategy of conservation protection. We conducted a gap analysis of the current reserve network, to evaluate representation by ecosite, and tested two approaches to identify potential additional reserves to increase to target areas of 6%, 7%, 10% and 15%: (1) selecting areas with maximum diversity of forest species composition, soil types, and elevation classes (‘heterogeneity method’, to incorporate the greatest amount of forest features in the smallest area); and (2) selecting areas to cover a total of 10% of the landbase, with 10% coverage of each ecosite area, if possible (‘representation method’). With a 10% target, the heterogeneity and representation methods resulted in 29 and 42 reserves, ranging from 490–2000 to 50–1500 ha, respectively. The heterogeneity method resulted in 13 fewer reserves, 10% more core area, 30% larger mean patch size, and 30% less edge. Representation of ecosites ranged from 0.9% to 23.3% in the current reserve network, 6.7–26.5% for the heterogeneity method, and 8.0–26.4% for the representation method. In simulations of management scenarios with 39–64% plantations and 10% unharvested reserves, projected softwood harvest was similar with both methods, at 2.3–2.5 million m 3 per 5-year period, while hardwood harvest was 0.02–0.09 million m 3 higher, at 0.79–0.82 million m 3 per 5-year period, with the representation than the heterogeneity method. Projected areas of old hardwood, softwood, and mixedwood habitats, defined based upon stand structure characteristics, were similar between the two methods, with up to 1000 ha more with the representation method in some projection periods. We conclude that the heterogeneity method was more effective in that it selected fewer reserves, with larger areas, more core area, and less edge. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Biological Conservation Elsevier

Using heterogeneity and representation of ecosite criteria to select forest reserves in an intensively managed industrial forest

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/using-heterogeneity-and-representation-of-ecosite-criteria-to-select-PM3fo4BW0f
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Elsevier B.V.
ISSN
0006-3207
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.028
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The 189,000 ha privately owned, industrial Black Brook District in New Brunswick, Canada, contains 27 forest reserve areas, totaling 9500 ha (5%), with a primary management strategy of conservation protection. We conducted a gap analysis of the current reserve network, to evaluate representation by ecosite, and tested two approaches to identify potential additional reserves to increase to target areas of 6%, 7%, 10% and 15%: (1) selecting areas with maximum diversity of forest species composition, soil types, and elevation classes (‘heterogeneity method’, to incorporate the greatest amount of forest features in the smallest area); and (2) selecting areas to cover a total of 10% of the landbase, with 10% coverage of each ecosite area, if possible (‘representation method’). With a 10% target, the heterogeneity and representation methods resulted in 29 and 42 reserves, ranging from 490–2000 to 50–1500 ha, respectively. The heterogeneity method resulted in 13 fewer reserves, 10% more core area, 30% larger mean patch size, and 30% less edge. Representation of ecosites ranged from 0.9% to 23.3% in the current reserve network, 6.7–26.5% for the heterogeneity method, and 8.0–26.4% for the representation method. In simulations of management scenarios with 39–64% plantations and 10% unharvested reserves, projected softwood harvest was similar with both methods, at 2.3–2.5 million m 3 per 5-year period, while hardwood harvest was 0.02–0.09 million m 3 higher, at 0.79–0.82 million m 3 per 5-year period, with the representation than the heterogeneity method. Projected areas of old hardwood, softwood, and mixedwood habitats, defined based upon stand structure characteristics, were similar between the two methods, with up to 1000 ha more with the representation method in some projection periods. We conclude that the heterogeneity method was more effective in that it selected fewer reserves, with larger areas, more core area, and less edge.

Journal

Biological ConservationElsevier

Published: Sep 1, 2005

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off