Trash or treasure? Prospects for full aluminum chain in China based on the recycling options

Trash or treasure? Prospects for full aluminum chain in China based on the recycling options In this study, a Life Cycle Inventory (LCI), based on Emergy Analysis, was conducted for the Chinese aluminum industry. The following four process stages were considered: (1) deposit formation; (2) production processes (such as bauxite mining, alumina refining, electrolysis & ingot casting, manufacturing and fabrication); (3) end use; (4) aluminum recycling process. Unit Emergy Values (UEVs), a measure of resource use efficiency, were computed along every stage of China's aluminum production system and compared with the corresponding UEVs for the USA. Although the UEVs in China were higher than those of USA, the observed gaps narrowed along the aluminum production chain from bauxite mining to end use. Subsequently, the change of all aluminum outputs UEVs were evaluated considering the change of recycling rates. The effects of changes in domestic production and import policy of aluminum outputs on aluminum production efficiencies (UEVs) were also considered. This work found, in terms of providing the best overall increase in efficiency, Restricting bauxite mining and importing bauxite resulted the best option, which provided the best overall efficiency increase, as shown by decreases in UEVs. The impact on overall production efficiencies of increasing the recyclable aluminum quantity, by including a higher recycling amount, was tested. A reduction of 2.41E+09 sej/kg in bauxite, 1.76E+11 sej/kg in alumina, 3.24E+11 sej/kg in aluminum ingot, 8.96E+12 sej/kg in recycled aluminum and 3.84E+12 sej/kg in aluminum product were found, fixing the recycling rate up to 100% and doubling the total amount of home and prompt scraps. Finally, results show that increased recycling provides also increased energy and material efficiencies throughout the production process. These results reveal that the most ideal production roadmap for China would consist in recycling as much aluminum as possible. This, in turn, demonstrates that aluminum trash would be the real treasure for China. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Cleaner Production Elsevier

Trash or treasure? Prospects for full aluminum chain in China based on the recycling options

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/trash-or-treasure-prospects-for-full-aluminum-chain-in-china-based-on-LLN4MacrTx
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0959-6526
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.075
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this study, a Life Cycle Inventory (LCI), based on Emergy Analysis, was conducted for the Chinese aluminum industry. The following four process stages were considered: (1) deposit formation; (2) production processes (such as bauxite mining, alumina refining, electrolysis & ingot casting, manufacturing and fabrication); (3) end use; (4) aluminum recycling process. Unit Emergy Values (UEVs), a measure of resource use efficiency, were computed along every stage of China's aluminum production system and compared with the corresponding UEVs for the USA. Although the UEVs in China were higher than those of USA, the observed gaps narrowed along the aluminum production chain from bauxite mining to end use. Subsequently, the change of all aluminum outputs UEVs were evaluated considering the change of recycling rates. The effects of changes in domestic production and import policy of aluminum outputs on aluminum production efficiencies (UEVs) were also considered. This work found, in terms of providing the best overall increase in efficiency, Restricting bauxite mining and importing bauxite resulted the best option, which provided the best overall efficiency increase, as shown by decreases in UEVs. The impact on overall production efficiencies of increasing the recyclable aluminum quantity, by including a higher recycling amount, was tested. A reduction of 2.41E+09 sej/kg in bauxite, 1.76E+11 sej/kg in alumina, 3.24E+11 sej/kg in aluminum ingot, 8.96E+12 sej/kg in recycled aluminum and 3.84E+12 sej/kg in aluminum product were found, fixing the recycling rate up to 100% and doubling the total amount of home and prompt scraps. Finally, results show that increased recycling provides also increased energy and material efficiencies throughout the production process. These results reveal that the most ideal production roadmap for China would consist in recycling as much aluminum as possible. This, in turn, demonstrates that aluminum trash would be the real treasure for China.

Journal

Journal of Cleaner ProductionElsevier

Published: Aug 20, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off