Transient pressure test analysis of horizontal wells in gas condensate reservoirs: Evaluation of conventional multi-phase pseudo-pressure solutions

Transient pressure test analysis of horizontal wells in gas condensate reservoirs: Evaluation of... Transient pressure test analysis, as a tool to well and reservoir characterization, is not well developed in two-phase horizontal wells. As our best knowledge, potential of conventional multiphase pseudo-pressure solutions in horizontal well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs below dew-point pressure has not been demonstrated yet. The most challenge is that flow regime around horizontal wells is not constant. Also, high velocity effects near wellbore are the other main conflict which need more investigation.The objective of this paper is to express encountered challenges in transient pressure test analysis of horizontal wells in gas condensate reservoirs below saturation pressure. For this purpose, based on simulated models, potential of the conventional multiphase pseudo-pressure solutions to interpret pressure behavior of these wells is examined. Also, their potential to estimate well and reservoir properties is investigated. After that, the reason for inability of these solutions in well test analysis of horizontal wells is explored. Furthermore, the effects of near wellbore phenomena on two-phase horizontal gas wells are studied.The results show that, during early radial flow, once bottom-hole pressure falls below dew-point, pressure data shows a composite behavior; however, two phase pseudo-pressure responses calculated by both steady-state and 3-zone solutions, can accurately correct the effect of liquid saturation. In the result, reservoir permeability is estimated with a good accuracy. The study also expressed that, during other flow regimes, deviation from single phase flow due to condensate accumulation cannot be corrected using conventional solutions of two-phase pseudo-pressure function. The reason is that fluid composition is not constant during any of the flow regimes except radial flow. Though, constant fluid composition is the basic assumption for the conventional solutions. Moreover, the result shows that non-Darcy effect in two-phase flow is less than single-phase. Also, positive coupling effect around horizontal wells is not as much significant as vertical wells. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering Elsevier

Transient pressure test analysis of horizontal wells in gas condensate reservoirs: Evaluation of conventional multi-phase pseudo-pressure solutions

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/transient-pressure-test-analysis-of-horizontal-wells-in-gas-condensate-zLxoHhaxFE
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V.
ISSN
0920-4105
eISSN
1873-4715
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.petrol.2016.05.046
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Transient pressure test analysis, as a tool to well and reservoir characterization, is not well developed in two-phase horizontal wells. As our best knowledge, potential of conventional multiphase pseudo-pressure solutions in horizontal well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs below dew-point pressure has not been demonstrated yet. The most challenge is that flow regime around horizontal wells is not constant. Also, high velocity effects near wellbore are the other main conflict which need more investigation.The objective of this paper is to express encountered challenges in transient pressure test analysis of horizontal wells in gas condensate reservoirs below saturation pressure. For this purpose, based on simulated models, potential of the conventional multiphase pseudo-pressure solutions to interpret pressure behavior of these wells is examined. Also, their potential to estimate well and reservoir properties is investigated. After that, the reason for inability of these solutions in well test analysis of horizontal wells is explored. Furthermore, the effects of near wellbore phenomena on two-phase horizontal gas wells are studied.The results show that, during early radial flow, once bottom-hole pressure falls below dew-point, pressure data shows a composite behavior; however, two phase pseudo-pressure responses calculated by both steady-state and 3-zone solutions, can accurately correct the effect of liquid saturation. In the result, reservoir permeability is estimated with a good accuracy. The study also expressed that, during other flow regimes, deviation from single phase flow due to condensate accumulation cannot be corrected using conventional solutions of two-phase pseudo-pressure function. The reason is that fluid composition is not constant during any of the flow regimes except radial flow. Though, constant fluid composition is the basic assumption for the conventional solutions. Moreover, the result shows that non-Darcy effect in two-phase flow is less than single-phase. Also, positive coupling effect around horizontal wells is not as much significant as vertical wells.

Journal

Journal of Petroleum Science and EngineeringElsevier

Published: Sep 1, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off