The relationship between child welfare financing, screening, and substantiation

The relationship between child welfare financing, screening, and substantiation This study examines the relationship between state-level child welfare spending and two important decision points in the child welfare system: the decision to screen out a referral and the decision to substantiate. The model is estimated using a pooled fractional probit estimator that controls for year effects and state-level clustering. The findings suggest that decreases in state-level child welfare expenditures predict increases in the proportion of referrals that are screened out and decreases in the proportion of maltreatment claims that are substantiated. The results are robust to the inclusion of caseload and federal spending as control variables, to the exclusion of states known to have changed their screening or funding practices during the sample period, and to the use of combined state and local child welfare expenditures as an explanatory variable in lieu of state-level child welfare expenditures. The findings imply that the amount of money a state spends on child welfare may influence important decisions in the child welfare process. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Children and Youth Services Review Elsevier

The relationship between child welfare financing, screening, and substantiation

6 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/the-relationship-between-child-welfare-financing-screening-and-SA4tM4d1qr
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0190-7409
eISSN
1873-7765
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.013
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between state-level child welfare spending and two important decision points in the child welfare system: the decision to screen out a referral and the decision to substantiate. The model is estimated using a pooled fractional probit estimator that controls for year effects and state-level clustering. The findings suggest that decreases in state-level child welfare expenditures predict increases in the proportion of referrals that are screened out and decreases in the proportion of maltreatment claims that are substantiated. The results are robust to the inclusion of caseload and federal spending as control variables, to the exclusion of states known to have changed their screening or funding practices during the sample period, and to the use of combined state and local child welfare expenditures as an explanatory variable in lieu of state-level child welfare expenditures. The findings imply that the amount of money a state spends on child welfare may influence important decisions in the child welfare process.

Journal

Children and Youth Services Review – Elsevier

Published: Nov 1, 2017

References

  • Twenty years after CAPTA: A portrait of the child protective services system
    American Humane Association
  • The decision-making ecology
    Baumann, D.; Dalgeish, L.; Fluke, J.; Kern, H.
  • Gaining control over child abuse reports
    Besharov, D.
  • How we can better protect children from abuse and neglect
    Besharov, D.
  • Microeconometrics using Stata
    Cameron, C.; Trivedi, P.
  • Making and screening reports of child abuse and neglect
    Child Welfare Information Gateway
  • The cost of child protection in the context of welfare reform
    Courtney, M.
  • Disentangling substantiation: The influence of race, risk and poverty on the substantiation decision in child welfare
    Dettlaff, A.; Rivaux, S.; Baumann, D.J.; Fluke, J.; Rycraft, J.
  • Federal, state, and local spending to address child abuse and neglect in SFY 2012
    DeVooght, K.; Fletcher, M.; Cooper, H.
  • Gatekeeping in child protective services: A survey of screening policies
    Downing, J.; Wells, S.; Fluke, J.
  • Unraveling “unsubstantiated”
    Drake, B.
  • Substantiation and recidivism
    Drake, B.; Jonson-Reid, M.; Way, I.; Chung, S.
  • The economic burden of child maltreatment in the United States and implications for prevention
    Fang, X.; Brown, D.; Florence, C.; Mercy, J.
  • Strengthening the child welfare workforce: Lessons from litigation
    Farber, J.; Munson, S.
  • Placement decisions and disparities among aboriginal groups: An application of the decision-making ecology through multi-level analysis
    Fluke, J.D.; Chabot, M.; Fallon, B.; MacLaurin, B.; Blackstock, C.
  • Examining racial disproportionality in child protective services case decisions
    Font, S.A.; Berger, L.M.; Slack, K.S.
  • Decision-making in child protective services: Influences at multiple levels of the social ecology
    Font, S.A.; Maguire-Jack, K.
  • Defining maltreatment according to substantiation: Distinction without a difference?
    Hussey, J.; Marshall, J.; English, D.; Knight, E.; Lau, A.; Dubowitz, H.; Kotch, J.
  • Is the overrepresentation of the poor in child welfare caseloads due to bias or need?
    Jonson-Reid, M.; Drake, B.; Kohl, P.L.
  • What do we really know about usual care child protective services?
    Jonson-Reid, M.; Drake, B.; Kohl, P.L.; Guo, S.; Brown, D.; McBride, T.; Lewis, E.
  • Child and adult outcomes of chronic child maltreatment
    Jonson-Reid, M.; Kohl, P.L.; Drake, B.
  • Thinking fast and slow
    Kahneman, D.
  • A guide to econometrics
    Kennedy, P.
  • Time to leave substantiation behind
    Kohl, P.L.; Jonson-Reid, M.; Drake, B.
  • Examining child welfare decisions and services for Asian-Canadian versus white-Canadian children and families in the child welfare system
    Lee, B.; Fuller-Thomson, E.; Fallon, B.; Black, T.; Trocmé, N.
  • The impact of prevention programs on decisions in child protective services
    Maguire-Jack, K.; Byers, K.
  • Can buy me love: The effect of child welfare expenditures on maltreatment outcomes
    Malcolm, M.
  • For the love of children. South bend tribune
    Malone, M.; Black, V.
  • Systemic reform litigation and child welfare policy: The case of Illinois
    Mezey, S.
  • Panel data methods for fractional response variables with an application to test pass rates
    Papke, L.E.; Wooldridge, J.M.
  • 2016 federal public policy agenda
    Prevent Child Abuse America
  • Risk of re-reporting among infants who remain at home following alleged maltreatment
    Putnam-Hornstein, E.; Simon, J.D.; Eastman, A.L.; Magruder, J.
  • Child welfare finance and foster care outcomes
    Russell, J.
  • Public health surveillance of fatal child maltreatment: Analysis of 3 state programs
    Schnitzer, P.; Covington, T.; Wirtz, S.; VerhoekOftedahl, W.; Palusci, V.
  • Child welfare practice in organizational and institutional context
    Smith, B.D.; Donovan, S.E.F.
  • Effects of a budget cut in a child welfare agency
    Surbeck, B.
  • Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
    Thaler, R.; Sunstein, C.
  • The decision to investigate: Understanding state child welfare screening policies and practices
    Tumlin, K.; Geen, R.
  • Intercensal estimates of the resident population by sex, race, and Hispanic origin for states
    U.S. Census Bureau
  • Child maltreatment 2014
    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
  • Ecological factors and screening in child protective services
    Wells, S.; Lyons, P.; Doueck, H.; Brown, C.; Thomas, J.
  • Screening in child protective services
    Wells, S.; Stein, T.; Fluke, J.; Downing, J.
  • The decision to investigate: Child protection practice in 12 local agencies
    Wells, S.J.; Fluke, J.D.; Brown, C.H.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial