Subtle differences in birds detected between organic and nonorganic farms in Saskatchewan Prairie Parklands by farm pair and bird functional group

Subtle differences in birds detected between organic and nonorganic farms in Saskatchewan Prairie... •We pooled species into functional groups; linear mixed models showed no significant differences between farm types for species richness but that all birds, migratory birds using crops and aerial insectivores were more abundant on organic farms.•Species composition and abundance of all birds did not differ between farm types according to permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Significant differences were evident between about half of farm pairs and were most pronounced for all birds, migratory birds using crops and ground feeders.•Non-metric multidimensional scaling of bootstrapped averages for each farm type suggested that there was more variation in β diversity on organic than nonorganic farms (i.e. higher β diversity) but the difference was not significant. β diversity was higher on organic farms for some pairs and functional groups but higher on nonorganic farms for other pairs and functional groups suggesting that patterns were not consistent.•As predicted, non-crop land cover and at a larger spatial extent was most important to farmland birds.•As predicted, land cover was a more important determinant of avian biodiversity than farming practices, but once controlled for, pesticide use had a significant and apparently negative effect.•Although the field extent was more important than the site extent for bird communities in variance partitioning, more significant effects of heterogeneity were found at the site extent than the field extent, irrespective of farm type.•Overall land cover heterogeneity had few significant effects at the site extent but positive effects on richness and/or abundance of several groups at the field extent. At the site extent significant positive effects of non-crop heterogeneity were found for richness and abundance of four groups, but no significant effects were found at the field extent. Crop heterogeneity had negative and largely non-significant effects at both extents (except for aerial insectivores at the field extent). http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Elsevier

Subtle differences in birds detected between organic and nonorganic farms in Saskatchewan Prairie Parklands by farm pair and bird functional group

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/subtle-differences-in-birds-detected-between-organic-and-nonorganic-J6Z71FW2Pq
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0167-8809
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.agee.2017.04.009
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

•We pooled species into functional groups; linear mixed models showed no significant differences between farm types for species richness but that all birds, migratory birds using crops and aerial insectivores were more abundant on organic farms.•Species composition and abundance of all birds did not differ between farm types according to permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Significant differences were evident between about half of farm pairs and were most pronounced for all birds, migratory birds using crops and ground feeders.•Non-metric multidimensional scaling of bootstrapped averages for each farm type suggested that there was more variation in β diversity on organic than nonorganic farms (i.e. higher β diversity) but the difference was not significant. β diversity was higher on organic farms for some pairs and functional groups but higher on nonorganic farms for other pairs and functional groups suggesting that patterns were not consistent.•As predicted, non-crop land cover and at a larger spatial extent was most important to farmland birds.•As predicted, land cover was a more important determinant of avian biodiversity than farming practices, but once controlled for, pesticide use had a significant and apparently negative effect.•Although the field extent was more important than the site extent for bird communities in variance partitioning, more significant effects of heterogeneity were found at the site extent than the field extent, irrespective of farm type.•Overall land cover heterogeneity had few significant effects at the site extent but positive effects on richness and/or abundance of several groups at the field extent. At the site extent significant positive effects of non-crop heterogeneity were found for richness and abundance of four groups, but no significant effects were found at the field extent. Crop heterogeneity had negative and largely non-significant effects at both extents (except for aerial insectivores at the field extent).

Journal

Agriculture, Ecosystems & EnvironmentElsevier

Published: Aug 1, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off