Responses of cold-formed steel storage racks with spine bracings using speed-lock connections with bolts I: Static elastic-plastic pushover analysis

Responses of cold-formed steel storage racks with spine bracings using speed-lock connections... The objective of this paper is to investigate the seismic performance of cold-formed steel storage racks with spine bracings using a variety of speed-lock connections with bolts, where their connection behaviors were based on previous experimental studies through monotonic and cyclic loading tests. The elastic-plastic connection models were developed for five types of bolted connections previously studied, namely, a speed lock connection (JD1), a speed lock connection with an upper bolt (JD2), a speed lock connection with a lower bolt (JD3), a speed lock connection with two bolts (JD4), and a speed lock connection with two bolts and a full flange welding (JD5). Then, the connection models were introduced into the global rack structures, both single entry and double entry racks, on which pushover analyses were performed to investigate their seismic responses. The study based on pushover analyses enabled the investigations of the progress of the plastic hinge development and the distribution of the plastic hinges for all the five connection models. In addition, the results also highlighted the performance differences of the racks using the studied connections under different seismic levels and provided their response modification factors and ductility coefficients. Moreover, the results showed that the capacity curves of the five types of connections were the same in the elastic region but diverged greatly in the plastic region. The upper bolt and welds were more effective in improving the seismic performance compared to the lower bolt. Furthermore, the double entry rack exhibited a better deformability and seismic performance compared to the single entry rack and the analysis also demonstrated collapse mechanisms of the double and single entry racks were quite different. The R-factors of the single and double entry racks were approximately 3.26 and 3.63–4.34, respectively. Responses of the racks based on nonlinear dynamic response history analyses are presented in a companion paper. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Thin-Walled Structures Elsevier

Responses of cold-formed steel storage racks with spine bracings using speed-lock connections with bolts I: Static elastic-plastic pushover analysis

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/responses-of-cold-formed-steel-storage-racks-with-spine-bracings-using-DAk0LsxNd9
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0263-8231
eISSN
1879-3223
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.tws.2018.01.005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to investigate the seismic performance of cold-formed steel storage racks with spine bracings using a variety of speed-lock connections with bolts, where their connection behaviors were based on previous experimental studies through monotonic and cyclic loading tests. The elastic-plastic connection models were developed for five types of bolted connections previously studied, namely, a speed lock connection (JD1), a speed lock connection with an upper bolt (JD2), a speed lock connection with a lower bolt (JD3), a speed lock connection with two bolts (JD4), and a speed lock connection with two bolts and a full flange welding (JD5). Then, the connection models were introduced into the global rack structures, both single entry and double entry racks, on which pushover analyses were performed to investigate their seismic responses. The study based on pushover analyses enabled the investigations of the progress of the plastic hinge development and the distribution of the plastic hinges for all the five connection models. In addition, the results also highlighted the performance differences of the racks using the studied connections under different seismic levels and provided their response modification factors and ductility coefficients. Moreover, the results showed that the capacity curves of the five types of connections were the same in the elastic region but diverged greatly in the plastic region. The upper bolt and welds were more effective in improving the seismic performance compared to the lower bolt. Furthermore, the double entry rack exhibited a better deformability and seismic performance compared to the single entry rack and the analysis also demonstrated collapse mechanisms of the double and single entry racks were quite different. The R-factors of the single and double entry racks were approximately 3.26 and 3.63–4.34, respectively. Responses of the racks based on nonlinear dynamic response history analyses are presented in a companion paper.

Journal

Thin-Walled StructuresElsevier

Published: Apr 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

Monthly Plan

  • Read unlimited articles
  • Personalized recommendations
  • No expiration
  • Print 20 pages per month
  • 20% off on PDF purchases
  • Organize your research
  • Get updates on your journals and topic searches

$49/month

Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial

Best Deal — 39% off

Annual Plan

  • All the features of the Professional Plan, but for 39% off!
  • Billed annually
  • No expiration
  • For the normal price of 10 articles elsewhere, you get one full year of unlimited access to articles.

$588

$360/year

billed annually
Start Free Trial

14-day Free Trial