Public acceptance of household energy-saving measures in Beijing: Heterogeneous preferences and policy implications

Public acceptance of household energy-saving measures in Beijing: Heterogeneous preferences and... Residents have different acceptance levels of household energy-saving measures and heterogeneous preferences for energy-saving attributes. Using questionnaire method, this paper studies the residents' acceptance of and preferences for 24 energy-saving measures in Beijing, China. Conjoint and variance analysis are used to examine preferences for attribute levels of energy-saving measures and the heterogeneity in preferences, respectively. The results show that energy-saving measures are relatively highly acceptable overall, while technical energy-saving measures are almost the least acceptable. The energy-saving domain (home versus transport) is the most important attribute that determines the acceptance level. Home and behavioral energy-saving measures are preferred to transport and technical energy-saving measures, respectively. For households living within the fourth Ring Road in Beijing and for people with high environmental concern, their average acceptance levels of energy-saving measures are 65% and 80% higher than those of their counterparts, respectively. Home energy-saving measures are more favored by households without elders over 60 years old, individuals with low educational level, and residents with low environmental concern, compared with their counterparts. Currently, effective policy tools targeting at behavioral energy conservation are scarce. Publicity about energy-saving measures contributes to improving residents' familiarity with these measures and environmental concern. Customized incentive policies are needed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Energy Policy Elsevier

Public acceptance of household energy-saving measures in Beijing: Heterogeneous preferences and policy implications

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/public-acceptance-of-household-energy-saving-measures-in-beijing-5mDTNhJYmO
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0301-4215
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.024
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Residents have different acceptance levels of household energy-saving measures and heterogeneous preferences for energy-saving attributes. Using questionnaire method, this paper studies the residents' acceptance of and preferences for 24 energy-saving measures in Beijing, China. Conjoint and variance analysis are used to examine preferences for attribute levels of energy-saving measures and the heterogeneity in preferences, respectively. The results show that energy-saving measures are relatively highly acceptable overall, while technical energy-saving measures are almost the least acceptable. The energy-saving domain (home versus transport) is the most important attribute that determines the acceptance level. Home and behavioral energy-saving measures are preferred to transport and technical energy-saving measures, respectively. For households living within the fourth Ring Road in Beijing and for people with high environmental concern, their average acceptance levels of energy-saving measures are 65% and 80% higher than those of their counterparts, respectively. Home energy-saving measures are more favored by households without elders over 60 years old, individuals with low educational level, and residents with low environmental concern, compared with their counterparts. Currently, effective policy tools targeting at behavioral energy conservation are scarce. Publicity about energy-saving measures contributes to improving residents' familiarity with these measures and environmental concern. Customized incentive policies are needed.

Journal

Energy PolicyElsevier

Published: Feb 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off