•From visual inspection and sample preparations, it is obvious that the sandstone from layer “A” at 1634m depth is poorly consolidated and little cemented.•The results from destructive geotechnical/rock mechanical tests support the macroscopic observation, that the sample is poorly consolidated compared to its depth of deposition.•The tests suggest that the sample has somewhat higher porosity than that measured in other wells at the Heletz site and by other methods.•Low strength of the sample may result from stress transfer or pore pressure build up.•To determine the epistemic uncertainty of the results, further tests of the reservoir rock is required.
International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control – Elsevier
Published: May 1, 2016
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera