Access the full text.
Sign up today, get unlimited access with DeepDyve Pro!
and observed across a variety of food types, environmental conditions, and study populations.4 Because portion sizes have increased in recent years,5–7 this phenomenon requires individuals to invoke personal ...
in alignment with the increase in personal equivalent income. This serves to increase effects of equivalent income in the least deprived area compared to the most deprived areas (reference group). Considering ...
of the gradually weaning participants from the dependency on staff and the group program toward independent self -regulation of exercise and diet. This process is one of a phased increase in the ratio of personal ...
changes on positive affective pain inhibition and positive AB relative to negative affective pain facilitation and negative AB, respectively. Furthermore, if changes in SWS drive the self -reported ...
this point of view, the growing health gap between employed and unemployed workers may reflect an increasing scope for indirect selection on the basis of these personal traits. In other words, the unemployed ...
the distributions of SSS ratings. On average, sleep deprivation had an effect on self -reported sleepiness: sleepiness was low right after the control night, but increased after the deprivation nights ...
economically strained portions of a population. In addition, the absolutely deprived groups in safe and highly developed countries should also feel more relatively deprived when compared to the most economically ...
argued that altered hedonic-valuation factors increase portion size and alter food selection after sleep loss.15 A well-described and consistent response to sleep loss is impaired alertness, which can ...
of loneliness for young adults in London’s most deprived boroughs? Materials and methods Neighbourhood selection Participants were recruited from the London boroughs of Newham, Hackney, Tower Hamlets, and Barking ...
the ICE effect size as shown in Model 4, but a 46% increase in risk comparing the bottom and top tertiles remained (RR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.02, 2.09). Table 3. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence ...
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get unlimited access with DeepDyve Pro!