Occupant satisfaction in Three-Star-certified office buildings based on comparative study using LEED and BREEAM

Occupant satisfaction in Three-Star-certified office buildings based on comparative study using... There is still a gap in research on the impact of Chinese Green Building Three-Star evaluation standard on occupant satisfaction. This paper reports the results of a preliminary comparative analysis of the satisfaction levels of occupants in relation to the building overall, building performance and several indoor environment quality (IEQ) parameters in different seasons for Three-Star certified and non-certified office buildings in the cold zone, hot summer-cold winter zone, and hot summer-warm winter zone. In addition, in light of previous research on occupants' satisfaction with LEED and BREEAM certified buildings, a further comparative analysis was performed to explore the difference in the impacts of different rating tools on occupant satisfaction. It was found that Three-Star building users were more satisfied than the users of non-certified buildings, with significant differences for all the parameters investigated without exception. In addition, in the relation to the air freshness in the transition season, air cleanliness in the transition season, humidity in winter, air cleanliness in winter, natural lighting in winter, acoustic environment in winter, colors & textures, IEQ control, building cleanliness, building maintenance, and building overall, Three-Star certification had a relatively small effect on occupant satisfaction in all three climate zones. The results of the comparative analysis seemed to show that the effects of LEED or BREEAM certification on occupants' satisfaction were not as marked as that of Three-Star certification. However, the reason behind this could be the difference in the performance of non-certified buildings, not the assessment methods. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Building and Environment Elsevier

Occupant satisfaction in Three-Star-certified office buildings based on comparative study using LEED and BREEAM

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/occupant-satisfaction-in-three-star-certified-office-buildings-based-xpg0k9YoBb
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0360-1323
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.01.011
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

There is still a gap in research on the impact of Chinese Green Building Three-Star evaluation standard on occupant satisfaction. This paper reports the results of a preliminary comparative analysis of the satisfaction levels of occupants in relation to the building overall, building performance and several indoor environment quality (IEQ) parameters in different seasons for Three-Star certified and non-certified office buildings in the cold zone, hot summer-cold winter zone, and hot summer-warm winter zone. In addition, in light of previous research on occupants' satisfaction with LEED and BREEAM certified buildings, a further comparative analysis was performed to explore the difference in the impacts of different rating tools on occupant satisfaction. It was found that Three-Star building users were more satisfied than the users of non-certified buildings, with significant differences for all the parameters investigated without exception. In addition, in the relation to the air freshness in the transition season, air cleanliness in the transition season, humidity in winter, air cleanliness in winter, natural lighting in winter, acoustic environment in winter, colors & textures, IEQ control, building cleanliness, building maintenance, and building overall, Three-Star certification had a relatively small effect on occupant satisfaction in all three climate zones. The results of the comparative analysis seemed to show that the effects of LEED or BREEAM certification on occupants' satisfaction were not as marked as that of Three-Star certification. However, the reason behind this could be the difference in the performance of non-certified buildings, not the assessment methods.

Journal

Building and EnvironmentElsevier

Published: Mar 15, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off