Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm

Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis... Two Monte Carlo-based approaches for assessing parameter uncertainty in complex hydrologic models are considered. The first, known as importance sampling, has been implemented in the generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework of Beven and Binley. The second, known as the Metropolis algorithm, differs from importance sampling in that it uses a random walk that adapts to the true probability distribution describing parameter uncertainty. Three case studies are used to investigate and illustrate these Monte Carlo approaches. The first considers a simple water balance model for which exact results are known. It is shown that importance sampling is inferior to Metropolis sampling. Unless a large number of random samples are drawn, importance sampling can produce seriously misleading results. The second and third case studies consider more complex catchment models to illustrate the insights the Metropolis algorithm can offer. They demonstrate assessment of parameter uncertainty in the presence of bimodality, evaluation of the significance of split-sample tests, use of prior information and the assessment of confidence limits on hydrologic responses not used in calibration. When compared with the capabilities of traditional inference based on first-order approximation, the Metropolis algorithm provides a quantum advance in our capability to deal with parameter uncertainty in hydrologic models. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Hydrology Elsevier

Monte Carlo assessment of parameter uncertainty in conceptual catchment models: the Metropolis algorithm

Journal of Hydrology, Volume 211 (1) – Nov 1, 1998

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/monte-carlo-assessment-of-parameter-uncertainty-in-conceptual-WFCuITp6yK
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
ISSN
0022-1694
eISSN
1879-2707
D.O.I.
10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00198-X
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Two Monte Carlo-based approaches for assessing parameter uncertainty in complex hydrologic models are considered. The first, known as importance sampling, has been implemented in the generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework of Beven and Binley. The second, known as the Metropolis algorithm, differs from importance sampling in that it uses a random walk that adapts to the true probability distribution describing parameter uncertainty. Three case studies are used to investigate and illustrate these Monte Carlo approaches. The first considers a simple water balance model for which exact results are known. It is shown that importance sampling is inferior to Metropolis sampling. Unless a large number of random samples are drawn, importance sampling can produce seriously misleading results. The second and third case studies consider more complex catchment models to illustrate the insights the Metropolis algorithm can offer. They demonstrate assessment of parameter uncertainty in the presence of bimodality, evaluation of the significance of split-sample tests, use of prior information and the assessment of confidence limits on hydrologic responses not used in calibration. When compared with the capabilities of traditional inference based on first-order approximation, the Metropolis algorithm provides a quantum advance in our capability to deal with parameter uncertainty in hydrologic models.

Journal

Journal of HydrologyElsevier

Published: Nov 1, 1998

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off