Loss of CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor cells due to washing can be reduced by the use of fixative-free erythrocyte lysing reagents

Loss of CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor cells due to washing can be reduced by the use of... Current protocols for sample preparation before flow cytometric enumeration of CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) include both lyse-non-wash and lyse and wash methods. Erythrocyte lysis without washing is the method of choice when absolute cell counts are to be assessed, whilst a washing step is recommended for immunological subtyping of CD34 + cells in order to reduce background fluorescence. Here, we analyzed the effect of the interaction between type of erythrocyte lysis reagent and washing on the outcomes of (i) CD34 + cell enumeration and (ii) expression of CD38 by CD34 + cells in a single-platform, whole-blood staining assay (Gratama, J.W., Keeney, M., Sutherland, D.R., 1999. Enumeration of CD34 + hematopoietic stem cell and progenitor cells. Curr. Protocols Cytometry 6(4), 1–22.). We studied seven commercially available lysing reagents (five containing fixative and two fixative-free) using 12 samples from cord blood ( n =4), mobilized peripheral blood ( n =4) and apheresis products ( n =4). Using the lyse and wash technique, significant reductions of absolute and relative numbers of CD34 + cells, as well as in the numbers of lymphocytes and leukocytes, were observed on samples that had been lysed using fixative-containing buffers as compared to the lyse-no-wash technique. Cell losses due to washing could be significantly reduced when samples were lysed using fixative-free buffers. ‘Postfixation’ using PBS+1% paraformaldehyde of samples that had been lysed using fixative-free buffers and then washed did not result in additional loss of CD34 + cells or other cell types. Finally, washing unfixed samples led to a slight decrease of CD38 monoclonal antibody bound to CD34 + cells as compared to samples that had been fixed during erythrocyte lysis. These results indicate that fixation renders (CD34 + ) cells sticky and leads to their loss from the cell suspension upon centrifugation and resuspension. We conclude that all seven lysing reagents can be used with confidence in a lyse-no-wash technique, but that only fixative-free lysing reagents should be used when a washing step is considered necessary. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Immunological Methods Elsevier

Loss of CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor cells due to washing can be reduced by the use of fixative-free erythrocyte lysing reagents

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/loss-of-cd34-hematopoietic-progenitor-cells-due-to-washing-can-be-k6xri02Wta
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.
ISSN
0022-1759
D.O.I.
10.1016/S0022-1759(00)00154-X
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Current protocols for sample preparation before flow cytometric enumeration of CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPC) include both lyse-non-wash and lyse and wash methods. Erythrocyte lysis without washing is the method of choice when absolute cell counts are to be assessed, whilst a washing step is recommended for immunological subtyping of CD34 + cells in order to reduce background fluorescence. Here, we analyzed the effect of the interaction between type of erythrocyte lysis reagent and washing on the outcomes of (i) CD34 + cell enumeration and (ii) expression of CD38 by CD34 + cells in a single-platform, whole-blood staining assay (Gratama, J.W., Keeney, M., Sutherland, D.R., 1999. Enumeration of CD34 + hematopoietic stem cell and progenitor cells. Curr. Protocols Cytometry 6(4), 1–22.). We studied seven commercially available lysing reagents (five containing fixative and two fixative-free) using 12 samples from cord blood ( n =4), mobilized peripheral blood ( n =4) and apheresis products ( n =4). Using the lyse and wash technique, significant reductions of absolute and relative numbers of CD34 + cells, as well as in the numbers of lymphocytes and leukocytes, were observed on samples that had been lysed using fixative-containing buffers as compared to the lyse-no-wash technique. Cell losses due to washing could be significantly reduced when samples were lysed using fixative-free buffers. ‘Postfixation’ using PBS+1% paraformaldehyde of samples that had been lysed using fixative-free buffers and then washed did not result in additional loss of CD34 + cells or other cell types. Finally, washing unfixed samples led to a slight decrease of CD38 monoclonal antibody bound to CD34 + cells as compared to samples that had been fixed during erythrocyte lysis. These results indicate that fixation renders (CD34 + ) cells sticky and leads to their loss from the cell suspension upon centrifugation and resuspension. We conclude that all seven lysing reagents can be used with confidence in a lyse-no-wash technique, but that only fixative-free lysing reagents should be used when a washing step is considered necessary.

Journal

Journal of Immunological MethodsElsevier

Published: May 26, 2000

References

  • Quantification of CD34 + cells: comparison of methods
    Fritsch, G.; Printz, D.; Stimpfl, M.; Dworzak, M.N.; Witt, V.; Pötschger, U.; Buchinger, P.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off