Liquid slip flow in a network of shale noncircular nanopores

Liquid slip flow in a network of shale noncircular nanopores Nanoscale pores in shale make the interaction of fluid molecules and pore walls more important than in conventional reservoirs, where the pores are orders of magnitude larger. Vast experimental observation in recent literature shows higher-than-expected liquid flow in nanopore systems. Therefore, conventional flow equations such as Darcy’s law may not be valid for shale systems because of the difference in the controlling physics of liquid flow. Two main characteristics of liquid flow in shale are pore geometry and liquid slip at the inner pore wall. By looking more closely at SEM images of shale samples, many angular- to slit-shaped geometry have been observed. The behavior of liquid flow in noncircular pores significantly deviates from the Hagen–Poiseuille flow equation used in circular pores. Additionally, liquid flow in microscale pores reasonably assumes a no-slip boundary condition on pore inner walls, which needs to be modified to slip boundary condition in nanoscale pores. In this study, we examined numerous SEM images of shale samples to summarize different pore shapes and sizes. We then used computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling for various geometric and slip conditions to develop a generalized flow equation to capture pore geometry and slip effect. The developed flow equation is used in pore-network modeling simulation to study effective liquid permeability in a shale system. Our study confirms that the assumption of simplified circular pore causes apparent permeability to be significantly overestimated. The discrepancy between the realistic multigeometry pore model and the simplified circular pore model becomes more pronounced when pore sizes reduce and liquid slip on the inner pore wall is taken into account. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Fuel Elsevier

Liquid slip flow in a network of shale noncircular nanopores

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/liquid-slip-flow-in-a-network-of-shale-noncircular-nanopores-QneNMOY0hU
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0016-2361
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.078
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Nanoscale pores in shale make the interaction of fluid molecules and pore walls more important than in conventional reservoirs, where the pores are orders of magnitude larger. Vast experimental observation in recent literature shows higher-than-expected liquid flow in nanopore systems. Therefore, conventional flow equations such as Darcy’s law may not be valid for shale systems because of the difference in the controlling physics of liquid flow. Two main characteristics of liquid flow in shale are pore geometry and liquid slip at the inner pore wall. By looking more closely at SEM images of shale samples, many angular- to slit-shaped geometry have been observed. The behavior of liquid flow in noncircular pores significantly deviates from the Hagen–Poiseuille flow equation used in circular pores. Additionally, liquid flow in microscale pores reasonably assumes a no-slip boundary condition on pore inner walls, which needs to be modified to slip boundary condition in nanoscale pores. In this study, we examined numerous SEM images of shale samples to summarize different pore shapes and sizes. We then used computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modeling for various geometric and slip conditions to develop a generalized flow equation to capture pore geometry and slip effect. The developed flow equation is used in pore-network modeling simulation to study effective liquid permeability in a shale system. Our study confirms that the assumption of simplified circular pore causes apparent permeability to be significantly overestimated. The discrepancy between the realistic multigeometry pore model and the simplified circular pore model becomes more pronounced when pore sizes reduce and liquid slip on the inner pore wall is taken into account.

Journal

FuelElsevier

Published: Sep 15, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off