Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters

Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to... Approximately half of the annual global energy supply is consumed in constructing, operating, and maintaining buildings. Because most of this energy comes from fossil fuels, it also contributes greatly to annual carbon emissions. When constructing a building, embodied energy is consumed through construction materials, building products, and construction processes along with any transportation, administration, and management involved. Operating energy is used in space conditioning, heating, lighting, and powering building appliances. In order to effectively reduce the carbon footprint of buildings, a comprehensive reduction in both embodied and operating energy is needed. Studies so far have focused on reducing either embodied or operating energy in isolation without realizing the trade-off that exists between them. Also, building energy research has concentrated more on operating energy than embodied energy, and as a result, the operating energy of buildings is gradually decreasing. Due to a variety of issues, however, few efforts have been undertaken to comprehensively minimize embodied energy.Quantifying embodied energy is more tedious, complex, and resource-consuming than measuring operating energy. Furthermore, the reported values of embodied energy vary significantly within and across geographic regions owing to certain methodological and data quality parameters. The literature has repeatedly pointed out a need to standardize these parameters to bring consistency to embodied energy calculations. This paper presents a rigorous review of literature in order to investigate these parameters and their impact on embodied energy calculations. The reported values of initial and life-cycle embodied energy are also presented to highlight variations due to differing parameters. Finally, we suggest a two-step solution to make the process of embodied energy analysis more streamlined and transparent through a set of guidelines and an uncertainty calculation model. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Elsevier

Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/life-cycle-embodied-energy-analysis-of-residential-buildings-a-review-Wf10GgXOeb
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
1364-0321
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.051
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Approximately half of the annual global energy supply is consumed in constructing, operating, and maintaining buildings. Because most of this energy comes from fossil fuels, it also contributes greatly to annual carbon emissions. When constructing a building, embodied energy is consumed through construction materials, building products, and construction processes along with any transportation, administration, and management involved. Operating energy is used in space conditioning, heating, lighting, and powering building appliances. In order to effectively reduce the carbon footprint of buildings, a comprehensive reduction in both embodied and operating energy is needed. Studies so far have focused on reducing either embodied or operating energy in isolation without realizing the trade-off that exists between them. Also, building energy research has concentrated more on operating energy than embodied energy, and as a result, the operating energy of buildings is gradually decreasing. Due to a variety of issues, however, few efforts have been undertaken to comprehensively minimize embodied energy.Quantifying embodied energy is more tedious, complex, and resource-consuming than measuring operating energy. Furthermore, the reported values of embodied energy vary significantly within and across geographic regions owing to certain methodological and data quality parameters. The literature has repeatedly pointed out a need to standardize these parameters to bring consistency to embodied energy calculations. This paper presents a rigorous review of literature in order to investigate these parameters and their impact on embodied energy calculations. The reported values of initial and life-cycle embodied energy are also presented to highlight variations due to differing parameters. Finally, we suggest a two-step solution to make the process of embodied energy analysis more streamlined and transparent through a set of guidelines and an uncertainty calculation model.

Journal

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsElsevier

Published: Nov 1, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off