Interceptor design for optimum trim control and minimum resistance of planing boats

Interceptor design for optimum trim control and minimum resistance of planing boats Interceptors are vertical blades installed symmetrically aft of the craft. This article aims to investigate the main geometrical (height and span length) parameters in interceptors. Different Models with and without interceptors at different heights and spans have been analyzed based on the finite volume method and SIMPLE algorithm using dynamic mesh. In order to validate CFD results, the grid convergence index (GCI method) has been used to estimate the uncertainties caused by grid-spacing and time-step. Although it has been proved that the interceptors are very useful in trim control and resistance reduction, choosing wrong size interceptors could not only destroy their effectiveness, but also endanger the planing boat due to the creation of a strong moment leading to negative trim. The results of this study show that among all effective variables, the boundary layer thickness (h) at the stern (where the interceptor is installed), is far more important than, some other particular parameter, on interceptor performance and should be taken into account in estimating the interceptor height (d) and span (s). Generally, the interceptor height should not be higher than 60 percent of boundary layer thickness at transom. For optimum efficiency, when the interceptor height equals 60 percent of the boundary layer, the interceptor span length should be seven times as much as the interceptor height. At the end, based on Reynolds number the paper presents three figures, setting the basis for optimal interceptor sizes for its use in planing boats. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Applied Ocean Research Elsevier

Interceptor design for optimum trim control and minimum resistance of planing boats

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/interceptor-design-for-optimum-trim-control-and-minimum-resistance-of-kfALMzmTzs
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0141-1187
eISSN
1879-1549
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.apor.2017.10.006
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Interceptors are vertical blades installed symmetrically aft of the craft. This article aims to investigate the main geometrical (height and span length) parameters in interceptors. Different Models with and without interceptors at different heights and spans have been analyzed based on the finite volume method and SIMPLE algorithm using dynamic mesh. In order to validate CFD results, the grid convergence index (GCI method) has been used to estimate the uncertainties caused by grid-spacing and time-step. Although it has been proved that the interceptors are very useful in trim control and resistance reduction, choosing wrong size interceptors could not only destroy their effectiveness, but also endanger the planing boat due to the creation of a strong moment leading to negative trim. The results of this study show that among all effective variables, the boundary layer thickness (h) at the stern (where the interceptor is installed), is far more important than, some other particular parameter, on interceptor performance and should be taken into account in estimating the interceptor height (d) and span (s). Generally, the interceptor height should not be higher than 60 percent of boundary layer thickness at transom. For optimum efficiency, when the interceptor height equals 60 percent of the boundary layer, the interceptor span length should be seven times as much as the interceptor height. At the end, based on Reynolds number the paper presents three figures, setting the basis for optimal interceptor sizes for its use in planing boats.

Journal

Applied Ocean ResearchElsevier

Published: Dec 1, 2017

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off