Independence and juvenile dispersal distances in wild and reintroduced Spanish imperial eagles

Independence and juvenile dispersal distances in wild and reintroduced Spanish imperial eagles Reintroductions have been increasingly used for species restoration and it seems that this conservation tool is going to be more used in the future. Consequently a better knowledge of consequences of this kind of management is needed. Several authors have found differences in dispersal distances among wild and reintroduced individuals; although no common explanation for this general trend (i.e. released animals moving farther than wild ones) has been proposed. Here we compared the dates of dispersal and the distribution of maximum distances during juvenile dispersal between a natural high density population and an alternative situation where young Spanish imperial eagles (Aquila adalberti) were reintroduced in a new area with a very low intra-specific density, and ad libitum feeding until the onset of dispersal. Results showed that maximum dispersal distances were longer in translocated (mean=205km) than in control juvenile eagles (mean=119.70km), and the shape of the distribution changed from leptokurtic right-skewed to quasi-normal. According to our results, for reintroduced young fed ad libitum, we can predict that effective dispersal distances will be longer in reintroduced young during juvenile dispersal than in natural populations. But dispersal distances might also depend on the distance from the release area to the nearest breeding population of the species. For reintroductions close to other existing populations, immigration of released young into existing populations would be greater than expected. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Biological Conservation Elsevier

Independence and juvenile dispersal distances in wild and reintroduced Spanish imperial eagles

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/independence-and-juvenile-dispersal-distances-in-wild-and-reintroduced-S0h5yo8GHr
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0006-3207
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.020
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Reintroductions have been increasingly used for species restoration and it seems that this conservation tool is going to be more used in the future. Consequently a better knowledge of consequences of this kind of management is needed. Several authors have found differences in dispersal distances among wild and reintroduced individuals; although no common explanation for this general trend (i.e. released animals moving farther than wild ones) has been proposed. Here we compared the dates of dispersal and the distribution of maximum distances during juvenile dispersal between a natural high density population and an alternative situation where young Spanish imperial eagles (Aquila adalberti) were reintroduced in a new area with a very low intra-specific density, and ad libitum feeding until the onset of dispersal. Results showed that maximum dispersal distances were longer in translocated (mean=205km) than in control juvenile eagles (mean=119.70km), and the shape of the distribution changed from leptokurtic right-skewed to quasi-normal. According to our results, for reintroduced young fed ad libitum, we can predict that effective dispersal distances will be longer in reintroduced young during juvenile dispersal than in natural populations. But dispersal distances might also depend on the distance from the release area to the nearest breeding population of the species. For reintroductions close to other existing populations, immigration of released young into existing populations would be greater than expected.

Journal

Biological ConservationElsevier

Published: Nov 1, 2015

References

  • Plasma chemistry in booted eagle (Hieraaetus pennatus) during breeding season
    Casado, E.; Balbontin, J.; Ferrer, M.
  • Density-dependent age of first reproduction as a buffer affecting persistence of small populations
    Ferrer, M.; Otalora, F.; García-Ruiz, J.M.
  • Disentangling the effect of parental care, food supply, and offspring decisions on the duration of the postfledging period
    Muriel, R.; Ferrer, M.; Balbontín, J.; Cabrera, L.; Calabuig, C.P.
  • Developing the science of reintroduction biology
    Seddon, P.J.; Armstrong, D.P.; Maloney, R.F.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off