Groundwater recharge predictions in contrasted climate: The effect of model complexity and calibration period on recharge rates

Groundwater recharge predictions in contrasted climate: The effect of model complexity and... We systematically evaluated the effect of model complexity and calibration strategy on estimated recharge using four varyingly complex models and a unique long-term recharge data set. A differential split sample test was carried out by using six calibration periods with climatically contrasting conditions in a constrained Monte Carlo approach. All models performed better during calibration than during validation due to differences in model structures and climatic conditions. The two more complex, physically-based models predicted the observed recharge with relatively small uncertainties, even when calibration and prediction periods had different climatic conditions. In contrast, the more simplistic soil-water balance model significantly underestimated the recharge rates. The fourth, semi-mechanistic model captured the observed recharge rates, but with a larger uncertainty range than the physically-based models. Our results may have relevant implications for a broad range of applications when recharge models are used as decision-making tools. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Environmental Modelling & Software Elsevier

Groundwater recharge predictions in contrasted climate: The effect of model complexity and calibration period on recharge rates

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/groundwater-recharge-predictions-in-contrasted-climate-the-effect-of-bbr95kTB0K
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
1364-8152
eISSN
1873-6726
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.02.005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We systematically evaluated the effect of model complexity and calibration strategy on estimated recharge using four varyingly complex models and a unique long-term recharge data set. A differential split sample test was carried out by using six calibration periods with climatically contrasting conditions in a constrained Monte Carlo approach. All models performed better during calibration than during validation due to differences in model structures and climatic conditions. The two more complex, physically-based models predicted the observed recharge with relatively small uncertainties, even when calibration and prediction periods had different climatic conditions. In contrast, the more simplistic soil-water balance model significantly underestimated the recharge rates. The fourth, semi-mechanistic model captured the observed recharge rates, but with a larger uncertainty range than the physically-based models. Our results may have relevant implications for a broad range of applications when recharge models are used as decision-making tools.

Journal

Environmental Modelling & SoftwareElsevier

Published: May 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off