From narration to argumentation: Intertextuality in two courtroom genres

From narration to argumentation: Intertextuality in two courtroom genres Underpinned by the assumptions that a text, even a monologic one, is constructed from snatches of prior texts, thereby engaging and articulating a multiplicity of ideological perspectives, and that the incorporated perspectives are pragmatically motivated, this study examines lawyers’ intertextual practices in two monologic courtroom genres: the opening statement and closing argument. Based on a high-profile Anglo-American case, the qualitative and quantitative analysis explores the sources, discursive functions and frequencies of reported discourse. The findings indicate that both genres are highly intertextual, but dynamically shift in terms of whose voices lawyers choose to incorporate and what purposes they are used to serve, including narrativization, (re)contextualization, legitimation, and deconstruction. Different patterns of intertextual practices not only create and negotiate two versions of reality but also contribute to the realization of the lawyer's distinct communicative goals in each phase of the trial. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Lingua Elsevier

From narration to argumentation: Intertextuality in two courtroom genres

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/from-narration-to-argumentation-intertextuality-in-two-courtroom-7jzxwEgemA
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
ISSN
0024-3841
eISSN
1872-6135
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.lingua.2017.10.003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Underpinned by the assumptions that a text, even a monologic one, is constructed from snatches of prior texts, thereby engaging and articulating a multiplicity of ideological perspectives, and that the incorporated perspectives are pragmatically motivated, this study examines lawyers’ intertextual practices in two monologic courtroom genres: the opening statement and closing argument. Based on a high-profile Anglo-American case, the qualitative and quantitative analysis explores the sources, discursive functions and frequencies of reported discourse. The findings indicate that both genres are highly intertextual, but dynamically shift in terms of whose voices lawyers choose to incorporate and what purposes they are used to serve, including narrativization, (re)contextualization, legitimation, and deconstruction. Different patterns of intertextual practices not only create and negotiate two versions of reality but also contribute to the realization of the lawyer's distinct communicative goals in each phase of the trial.

Journal

LinguaElsevier

Published: Feb 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off