Examining hearing quality in child abuse and neglect cases: The relationship between breadth of discussion and case outcomes

Examining hearing quality in child abuse and neglect cases: The relationship between breadth of... Child abuse and neglect court hearings are complex, multifaceted, and necessary for judicial oversight to ensure safe, timely permanency for youth and families involved in the system. While best practices have been suggested, little research has been conducted to examine what the critical components of a “high quality” dependency court hearing are, and, more importantly how these factors might be related to improved outcomes for children and families. The current study explores the relationship between breadth of discussion at the first hearing on the case and subsequent case decisions and outcomes. Findings suggest a positive relationship between breadth of discussion at the initial hearing and a higher likelihood of relative or parent placements compared to foster care placements, increased presence of parents throughout the life of the case, and higher likelihood of case closure and reunification. The study is limited by a small sample size and focus on one of many court hearings; however, it does provide empirical support that the quality of the court hearing may be related to better outcomes for families. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Children and Youth Services Review Elsevier

Examining hearing quality in child abuse and neglect cases: The relationship between breadth of discussion and case outcomes

9 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/examining-hearing-quality-in-child-abuse-and-neglect-cases-the-tW1kJbQ0bt
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0190-7409
eISSN
1873-7765
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.10.018
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Child abuse and neglect court hearings are complex, multifaceted, and necessary for judicial oversight to ensure safe, timely permanency for youth and families involved in the system. While best practices have been suggested, little research has been conducted to examine what the critical components of a “high quality” dependency court hearing are, and, more importantly how these factors might be related to improved outcomes for children and families. The current study explores the relationship between breadth of discussion at the first hearing on the case and subsequent case decisions and outcomes. Findings suggest a positive relationship between breadth of discussion at the initial hearing and a higher likelihood of relative or parent placements compared to foster care placements, increased presence of parents throughout the life of the case, and higher likelihood of case closure and reunification. The study is limited by a small sample size and focus on one of many court hearings; however, it does provide empirical support that the quality of the court hearing may be related to better outcomes for families.

Journal

Children and Youth Services Review – Elsevier

Published: Nov 1, 2017

References

  • PL 105-89
    Adoption and Safe Families Act
  • Standards of practice for lawyers who represent children in abuse and neglect cases
    American Bar Association
  • Standards of practice for attorneys representing parents in abuse and neglect cases
    American Bar Association
  • Standards of practice for lawyers representing child welfare agencies
    American Bar Association
  • Child welfare in the United States: Policy, practice and innovations in service delivery
    Brooks, D.; Webster, D.
  • The alcoholic family in recovery. A developmental model
    Brown, S.; Lewis, V.
  • National Report on court improvement program projects and initiatives FY 2015
    Child Welfare Capacity Building Center for Courts
  • Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Outcomes at age 23 and 24
    Courtney, M.; Dworsky, A.; Lee, J.; Raap, M.
  • Parenting visiting and foster care reunification
    Davis, I.P.; Landsverk, J.; Newton, R.; Ganger, W.
  • Causal effects of foster care: An instrumental-variables approach
    Doyle, J.J.
  • Achieving timely permanency in child protection courts: The importance of frontloading the court process
    Edwards, L.P.
  • Child welfare and the courts; A statewide study with implications for professional development, practice, and change
    Ellett, A.J.; Steib, S.D.
  • Enhanced resource guidelines: Improving court practice in child abuse and neglect cases
    Gatowski, S.; Miller, N.; Rubin, S.; Escher, P.; Maze, C.
  • Does substance abuse treatment make a difference for child welfare case outcomes? A statewide longitudinal analysis
    Green, B.L.; Rockhill, A.; Furrer, C.
  • How soon is too soon? Addiction recovery and family reunification
    Hohman, M.M.; Butt, R.L.
  • Efficacy of relapse prevention: A meta-analytic review
    Irvin, J.E.; Bowers, C.A.; Dunn, M.E.; Wang, M.C.
  • Judges', caseworkers', and substance abuse counselors' indicators of family reunification with substance-affected parents
    Karoll, B.R.; Poertner, J.
  • The impact of foster care on development
    Lawrence, C.; Carlson, E.; Egeland, B.
  • Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments
    Lind, E.A.; Kanfer, R.; Earley, P.C.
  • The social psychology of procedural justice
    Lind, E.A.; Tyler, T.R.
  • Assessing the relationship between the quality of juvenile dependency hearings and foster care placements
    Macgill, S.; Summers, A.
  • Resource guidelines: Improving court practice in child abuse & neglect cases
    National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
  • Right from the start: The CCC preliminary protective hearing benchcard study report—Testing a tool for judicial decision-making
    National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges
  • The National Evaluation of the Court Improvement Program (CIP), synthesis of 2005 court improvement program reform and activities
    Planning and Learning Technologies, Inc., Urban Institute, and Center for Policy Research
  • Reflective decision-making and foster care placements
    Russell, J.; Summers, A.
  • The effectiveness of child welfare services for poor, neglected children: A review of the empirical evidence
    Smokowski, P.R.; Wodarski, J.S.
  • What does court observation tell us about judicial practice and the courts in child welfare?
    Summers, A.; Darnell, A.
  • What is procedural justice?: Criteria used by citizens to assess the fairness of legal procedures
    Tyler, T.R.
  • Reports and results of the child and family service reviews
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Effects of parental and attorney involvement on reunification in juvenile dependency cases
    Wood, S.; Russell, J.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial