Evaluation of methods for determining crack initiation stress under compression

Evaluation of methods for determining crack initiation stress under compression The accurate determination of crack initiation stress (CI) is significant for understanding rock deformation and failure. In this paper, a new concept is introduced, namely the relative compression strain response (RCSR), which represents the compressive deformation of the rock before dilatancy of the rock is introduced. An RCSR-based method for determining CI is proposed and compared with existing methods, i.e., (1) the volumetric strain (VS) method, (2) the lateral strain (LS) method, (3) the crack volumetric strain (CVS) method, (4) the cumulative acoustic emission hit tangent (CAEHT) method, and (5) the lateral strain response (LSR) method. Data for the comparison are collected from 227 uniaxial compression test and 222 compression test for diverse rock types. The comparison results show that, the CI determined using the proposed method is in good agreement with that determined using the existing methods. The CI values determined using different methods are similar, at approximately 0.5 of uniaxial compressive strength (UCS). The ratio of CI to peak strength (PS) is approximately 0.55 under triaxial compression, which is greater than the CI/UCS ratio. According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA), there is no statistical difference among the existing methods. Compared with the exisiting methods, the proposed method has advantages of avoiding users judgment subjectivity Thus, the RCSR method can be employed to determine the CI under uniaxial and triaxial compression. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Engineering Geology Elsevier

Evaluation of methods for determining crack initiation stress under compression

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/evaluation-of-methods-for-determining-crack-initiation-stress-under-056na7069H
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0013-7952
eISSN
1872-6917
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.01.018
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The accurate determination of crack initiation stress (CI) is significant for understanding rock deformation and failure. In this paper, a new concept is introduced, namely the relative compression strain response (RCSR), which represents the compressive deformation of the rock before dilatancy of the rock is introduced. An RCSR-based method for determining CI is proposed and compared with existing methods, i.e., (1) the volumetric strain (VS) method, (2) the lateral strain (LS) method, (3) the crack volumetric strain (CVS) method, (4) the cumulative acoustic emission hit tangent (CAEHT) method, and (5) the lateral strain response (LSR) method. Data for the comparison are collected from 227 uniaxial compression test and 222 compression test for diverse rock types. The comparison results show that, the CI determined using the proposed method is in good agreement with that determined using the existing methods. The CI values determined using different methods are similar, at approximately 0.5 of uniaxial compressive strength (UCS). The ratio of CI to peak strength (PS) is approximately 0.55 under triaxial compression, which is greater than the CI/UCS ratio. According to the analysis of variance (ANOVA), there is no statistical difference among the existing methods. Compared with the exisiting methods, the proposed method has advantages of avoiding users judgment subjectivity Thus, the RCSR method can be employed to determine the CI under uniaxial and triaxial compression.

Journal

Engineering GeologyElsevier

Published: Mar 9, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off