Evaluating the use of whole-genome sequencing for outbreak investigations in the lack of closely related reference genome

Evaluating the use of whole-genome sequencing for outbreak investigations in the lack of closely... Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a powerful molecular typing method for outbreak analysis enabling the rapid discrimination between outbreak and non-outbreak isolates. However, such analysis can be challenging in the absence of closely related reference genomes. In this study, we assessed the use of WGS in investigating an outbreak of a relatively understudied bacterial pathogen with no publicly available closely related reference genome. Eleven Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) isolates (seven from patients and four from disposable dermal gloves packages) that were collected during an outbreak were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Our results showed that mapping the 11 sequenced Bcc outbreak isolates against a genetically distant reference genome yield loses coverage (31.6–48.3%) and a high number of detected false single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (1123–2139). Therefore, a reference genome consensus from an outbreak clinical isolate was generated by combining both de novo assembly and mapping approaches. Based on this approach, we were able to demonstrate that the Bcc outbreak isolates were closely related and were phylogenetically distinct from the 11 publically available Bcc genomes. In addition, the pairwise SNP distance analysis detected only 1 to 6 SNPs differences among the outbreak isolates, confirming that contaminated disposable dermal gloves were the cause of the outbreak. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Infection, Genetics and Evolution Elsevier

Evaluating the use of whole-genome sequencing for outbreak investigations in the lack of closely related reference genome

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/evaluating-the-use-of-whole-genome-sequencing-for-outbreak-cftpeCNs0c
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
ISSN
1567-1348
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.meegid.2018.01.014
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a powerful molecular typing method for outbreak analysis enabling the rapid discrimination between outbreak and non-outbreak isolates. However, such analysis can be challenging in the absence of closely related reference genomes. In this study, we assessed the use of WGS in investigating an outbreak of a relatively understudied bacterial pathogen with no publicly available closely related reference genome. Eleven Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) isolates (seven from patients and four from disposable dermal gloves packages) that were collected during an outbreak were sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Our results showed that mapping the 11 sequenced Bcc outbreak isolates against a genetically distant reference genome yield loses coverage (31.6–48.3%) and a high number of detected false single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (1123–2139). Therefore, a reference genome consensus from an outbreak clinical isolate was generated by combining both de novo assembly and mapping approaches. Based on this approach, we were able to demonstrate that the Bcc outbreak isolates were closely related and were phylogenetically distinct from the 11 publically available Bcc genomes. In addition, the pairwise SNP distance analysis detected only 1 to 6 SNPs differences among the outbreak isolates, confirming that contaminated disposable dermal gloves were the cause of the outbreak.

Journal

Infection, Genetics and EvolutionElsevier

Published: Apr 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off