A debate periodically recurs in Futures Studies circles which concerns the ethical commitment of futurists to a better future. The question is generally posed along two lines of arguments, or more accurately, assumptions. First, futurists have an obligation to work for a better future. Second, this duty implies some degree of effective achievement. I will argue that these are two incorrectly based assumptions. I set aside that it is indeed questionable whether futurists have a greater commitment to the future than any other professional, academic or cultural community. I propose in this essay to postulate that, as a general rule, is better to opt for an ethical low profile approach to the future. What are we to make of the first argument that futurists have a particular ‘obligation’ towards the future? Those who advocate the view that futurists should work for a better future are implying a particularly binding obligation, a greater accountability than other people individually or collectively considered. Why is this so? Why should futurists have a stronger duty than politicians, farmers, teachers, plumbers or cooks or anyone else? It could be argued that it is because of an implicit ‘discipline-centrism’. Arguments that favour the futurists'
Futures – Elsevier
Published: Apr 1, 2006
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera