Estimating the costs of conserving a biodiversity hotspot: a case-study of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa

Estimating the costs of conserving a biodiversity hotspot: a case-study of the Cape Floristic... The lack of realistic estimates of the costs of protected area establishment and effective management can hinder conservation planning and result in under-funded “paper parks” that fail to meet conservation goals. This study comprises the first comprehensive and systematic estimate of the costs of conserving a globally recognised biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Floristic Region. To our knowledge, it is also the first study to use specific relationships between protected area attributes and management costs to estimate the long-term costs of implementing a regional conservation plan. We derived a configuration for an expanded protected area system and two off-reserve mechanisms (contractual reserves and other incentive mechanisms) that achieve explicit conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process identified in a systematic conservation planning process. Using a costing model, we then estimated the costs of establishing and maintaining this reserve system. Although the reserve system is one of many potential configurations that may achieve the designated conservation targets, the results indicate that the costs of conservation are substantial. An expenditure of $45.6 million per year, assuming a 20-year implementation horizon, is required to develop a representative reserve system, while the annual costs of maintaining this system are $24.4 million. Owing to the economies of scale, especially the marked increase in unit management costs when protected area size <600 ha, the predicted cost of managing the expanded system was only 1.2 times that of the existing system. Overall, the level of expenditure required to effectively conserve the region's biodiversity is low relative to its regional and global significance. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Biological Conservation Elsevier

Estimating the costs of conserving a biodiversity hotspot: a case-study of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/estimating-the-costs-of-conserving-a-biodiversity-hotspot-a-case-study-0Oto4gVnVX
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd
ISSN
0006-3207
D.O.I.
10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00400-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The lack of realistic estimates of the costs of protected area establishment and effective management can hinder conservation planning and result in under-funded “paper parks” that fail to meet conservation goals. This study comprises the first comprehensive and systematic estimate of the costs of conserving a globally recognised biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Floristic Region. To our knowledge, it is also the first study to use specific relationships between protected area attributes and management costs to estimate the long-term costs of implementing a regional conservation plan. We derived a configuration for an expanded protected area system and two off-reserve mechanisms (contractual reserves and other incentive mechanisms) that achieve explicit conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process identified in a systematic conservation planning process. Using a costing model, we then estimated the costs of establishing and maintaining this reserve system. Although the reserve system is one of many potential configurations that may achieve the designated conservation targets, the results indicate that the costs of conservation are substantial. An expenditure of $45.6 million per year, assuming a 20-year implementation horizon, is required to develop a representative reserve system, while the annual costs of maintaining this system are $24.4 million. Owing to the economies of scale, especially the marked increase in unit management costs when protected area size <600 ha, the predicted cost of managing the expanded system was only 1.2 times that of the existing system. Overall, the level of expenditure required to effectively conserve the region's biodiversity is low relative to its regional and global significance.

Journal

Biological ConservationElsevier

Published: Jul 1, 2003

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off