Environmental assessment of a landfill leachate treatment plant: Impacts and research for more sustainable chemical alternatives

Environmental assessment of a landfill leachate treatment plant: Impacts and research for more... The aim of this study is to evaluate, from an environmental point of view, the performance of various technologies applied to the treatment of municipal landfill leachate. The study has been led in an Italian wastewater treatment plant and it applies the principles of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) technique, using ReCiPe as the assessment method. This study shows how the operating stage of a wastewater treatment plant, that applies chemical and physical treatments, can affect the following four environmental impact categories: “Freshwater Eutrophication”, “Freshwater Ecotoxicity”, “Marine Ecotoxicity” and “Human Toxicity”. Within this operating stage, the study shows the relevant environmental impacts generated by the use of polyaluminum chloride (PAC) as a coagulant chemical agent and sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) as a pH control chemical agent. In order to investigate these results, and to discover more eco-friendly alternatives, two LCA comparisons have been carried out, comparing respectively the above two agents to analogous and common substitutes: ferric chloride as a coagulant agent and calcium hydroxide (lime) as a pH control agent. These comparisons demonstrate the higher environmental impacts of the use of ferric chloride over PAC and of sodium hydroxide over calcium hydroxide. Ferric chloride has shown to have more than double the environmental impact of PAC in 9 environmental categories out of the 10 considered, while calcium hydroxide has been able to cut down the negative environmental impacts of the sodium hydroxide of more than 65% in all the environmental categories. Considering the highly positive environmental results achieved from our study, whenever possible, a substitution of calcium hydroxide to sodium hydroxide and of PAC to ferric chloride is strongly recommended. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Cleaner Production Elsevier

Environmental assessment of a landfill leachate treatment plant: Impacts and research for more sustainable chemical alternatives

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/environmental-assessment-of-a-landfill-leachate-treatment-plant-7AI04FSLVL
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0959-6526
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.219
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate, from an environmental point of view, the performance of various technologies applied to the treatment of municipal landfill leachate. The study has been led in an Italian wastewater treatment plant and it applies the principles of the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) technique, using ReCiPe as the assessment method. This study shows how the operating stage of a wastewater treatment plant, that applies chemical and physical treatments, can affect the following four environmental impact categories: “Freshwater Eutrophication”, “Freshwater Ecotoxicity”, “Marine Ecotoxicity” and “Human Toxicity”. Within this operating stage, the study shows the relevant environmental impacts generated by the use of polyaluminum chloride (PAC) as a coagulant chemical agent and sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) as a pH control chemical agent. In order to investigate these results, and to discover more eco-friendly alternatives, two LCA comparisons have been carried out, comparing respectively the above two agents to analogous and common substitutes: ferric chloride as a coagulant agent and calcium hydroxide (lime) as a pH control agent. These comparisons demonstrate the higher environmental impacts of the use of ferric chloride over PAC and of sodium hydroxide over calcium hydroxide. Ferric chloride has shown to have more than double the environmental impact of PAC in 9 environmental categories out of the 10 considered, while calcium hydroxide has been able to cut down the negative environmental impacts of the sodium hydroxide of more than 65% in all the environmental categories. Considering the highly positive environmental results achieved from our study, whenever possible, a substitution of calcium hydroxide to sodium hydroxide and of PAC to ferric chloride is strongly recommended.

Journal

Journal of Cleaner ProductionElsevier

Published: May 10, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off