“Whoa! It's like Spotify but for academic articles.”

Instant Access to Thousands of Journals for just $40/month

Get 2 Weeks Free

Diagnostic accuracy of MRCP in choledocholithiasis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of MRCP in diagnosing choledcholithiasis considering endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as the gold standard. To compare the results achieved during the first two years of use (1999–2000) of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis with those achieved during the following two years (2001–2002) in order to establish the repeatability and objectivity of MRCP results. Materials and methods: One hundred and seventy consecutive patients underwent MRCP followed by FRCP within 72 h. In 22/170 (13%) patients, ERCP was unsuccessful for different reasons. MRCP was performed using a 1.5 T magnet with both multislice HASTE sequences and thick-slice projection technique. Choledocholithiasis was diagnosed in the presence of signal void images in the dependent portion of the duct surrounded by hyperintense bile and detected at least in two projections. The MRCP results, read independently from the ERCP results, were compared in two different and subsequent periods. Results: ERCF confirmed choledocholithiasis in 87 patients. In these cases, the results of MRCP were the following: 78 true positives, 53 true negatives, 7 false positives, and 9 false negatives. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 90%, 88%, and 89%, respectively. After the exclusion of stones with diameters smaller than 6 mm, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100%, 99%, and 99%, respectively. MRCP accuracy was related to the size of the stones. There was no significant statistical difference between the results obtained in the first 2-year period and those obtained in the second period. Conclusions: MRCP is sufficiently accurate to replace ERCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. The results are related to the size of stones. The use of well-defined radiological signs allows good diagnostic accuracy independent of the learning curve.</P> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical Imaging Elsevier
Loading next page...
1 Page

You're reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

And millions more from thousands of peer-reviewed journals, for just $40/month

Get 2 Weeks Free

To be the best researcher, you need access to the best research

  • With DeepDyve, you can stop worrying about how much articles cost, or if it's too much hassle to order — it's all at your fingertips. Your research is important and deserves the top content.
  • Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from Springer, Elsevier, Nature, IEEE, Wiley-Blackwell and more.
  • All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

Stop missing out on the latest updates in your field

  • We’ll send you automatic email updates on the keywords and journals you tell us are most important to you.
  • There is a lot of content out there, so we help you sift through it and stay organized.