Comparison of the metal–organic framework MIL-101 (Cr) versus four commercial adsorbents for nitrogen compounds removal in diesel feedstocks

Comparison of the metal–organic framework MIL-101 (Cr) versus four commercial adsorbents for... Fuel 180 (2016) 284–291 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fuel journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fuel Full Length Article Comparison of the metal–organic framework MIL-101 (Cr) versus four commercial adsorbents for nitrogen compounds removal in diesel feedstocks a,⇑ a,b a Georgina C. Laredo , Pedro M. Vega-Merino , J. Ascención Montoya-de la Fuente , a a,b a a Rodolfo J. Mora-Vallejo , Edith Meneses-Ruiz , J. Jesús Castillo , Beatriz Zapata-Rendón Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Lázaro Cárdenas 152, México 07730 D.F., Mexico Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CICATA-Unidad Legaria, Legaria 694, México 11500 D.F., Mexico highlights graphical a bstract Nitrogen-compounds (NC) adsorption in real feeds was studied using five adsorbents. Four commercial adsorbents and one metal–organic framework (MOF) were compared. MOF has at least a NC adsorption capacity of 2.3 times higher than the others. The NC adsorption rate was at least 2.4 times faster in the MOF than in the others. MOF may treat at least 2.3 more fuel as mL/g than the others. ar ti c l e i nf o ab stra ct Article history: Performance of metal–organic framework MIL-101 (Cr) to remove, through adsorption, organic nitrogen (N-) Received 31 July 2015 compounds from straight run gas oil (SRGO) and straight http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Fuel Elsevier

Comparison of the metal–organic framework MIL-101 (Cr) versus four commercial adsorbents for nitrogen compounds removal in diesel feedstocks

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/comparison-of-the-metal-organic-framework-mil-101-cr-versus-four-j5nRFRtQuv
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0016-2361
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.fuel.2016.04.038
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Fuel 180 (2016) 284–291 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Fuel journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fuel Full Length Article Comparison of the metal–organic framework MIL-101 (Cr) versus four commercial adsorbents for nitrogen compounds removal in diesel feedstocks a,⇑ a,b a Georgina C. Laredo , Pedro M. Vega-Merino , J. Ascención Montoya-de la Fuente , a a,b a a Rodolfo J. Mora-Vallejo , Edith Meneses-Ruiz , J. Jesús Castillo , Beatriz Zapata-Rendón Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo, Lázaro Cárdenas 152, México 07730 D.F., Mexico Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CICATA-Unidad Legaria, Legaria 694, México 11500 D.F., Mexico highlights graphical a bstract Nitrogen-compounds (NC) adsorption in real feeds was studied using five adsorbents. Four commercial adsorbents and one metal–organic framework (MOF) were compared. MOF has at least a NC adsorption capacity of 2.3 times higher than the others. The NC adsorption rate was at least 2.4 times faster in the MOF than in the others. MOF may treat at least 2.3 more fuel as mL/g than the others. ar ti c l e i nf o ab stra ct Article history: Performance of metal–organic framework MIL-101 (Cr) to remove, through adsorption, organic nitrogen (N-) Received 31 July 2015 compounds from straight run gas oil (SRGO) and straight

Journal

FuelElsevier

Published: Sep 15, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed
Create lists to organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off