Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment

Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process... To reduce the environmental burden of agriculture, suitable methods to comprehend and assess the impact on natural resources are needed. One of the methods considered is the life cycle assessment (LCA) method, which was used to assess the environmental impacts of 18 grassland farms in three different farming intensities — intensive, extensified, and organic — in the Allgäu region in southern Germany. Extensified and organic compared with intensive farms could reduce negative effects in the abiotic impact categories of energy use, global warming potential (GWP) and ground water mainly by renouncing mineral nitrogen fertilizer. Energy consumption of intensive farms was 19.1 GJ ha −1 and 2.7 GJ t −1 milk, of extensified and organic farms 8.7 and 5.9 GJ ha −1 along with 1.3 and 1.2 GJ t −1 milk, respectively. Global warming potential was 9.4, 7.0 and 6.3 CO 2 -equivalents ha −1 and 1.3, 1.0 and 1.3 CO 2 -equivalents t −1 milk for the intensive, extensified and organic farms, respectively. Acidification calculated in SO 2 -equivalents was high, but the extensified (119 kg SO 2 ha −1 ) and the organic farms (107 kg SO 2 ha −1 ) emit a lower amount compared with the intensive farms (136 kg SO 2 ha −1 ). Eutrophication potential computed in PO 4 -equivalents was higher for intensive (54.2 kg PO 4 ha −1 ) compared with extensified (31.2 kg PO 4 ha −1 ) and organic farms (13.5 kg PO 4 ha −1 ). Farmgate balances for N (80.1, 31.4 and 31.1 kg ha −1 ) and P (5.3, 4.5 and −2.3 kg ha −1 ) for intensive, extensified and organic farms, respectively, indicate the different impacts on ground and surface water quality. Analysing the impact categories biodiversity, landscape image and animal husbandry, organic farms had clear advantages in the indicators number of grassland species, grazing cattle, layout of farmstead and herd management, but indices in these categories showed a wide range and are partly independent of the farming system. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Elsevier

Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/comparing-intensive-extensified-and-organic-grassland-farming-in-GjI50FwJfU
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V.
ISSN
0167-8809
D.O.I.
10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00160-2
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To reduce the environmental burden of agriculture, suitable methods to comprehend and assess the impact on natural resources are needed. One of the methods considered is the life cycle assessment (LCA) method, which was used to assess the environmental impacts of 18 grassland farms in three different farming intensities — intensive, extensified, and organic — in the Allgäu region in southern Germany. Extensified and organic compared with intensive farms could reduce negative effects in the abiotic impact categories of energy use, global warming potential (GWP) and ground water mainly by renouncing mineral nitrogen fertilizer. Energy consumption of intensive farms was 19.1 GJ ha −1 and 2.7 GJ t −1 milk, of extensified and organic farms 8.7 and 5.9 GJ ha −1 along with 1.3 and 1.2 GJ t −1 milk, respectively. Global warming potential was 9.4, 7.0 and 6.3 CO 2 -equivalents ha −1 and 1.3, 1.0 and 1.3 CO 2 -equivalents t −1 milk for the intensive, extensified and organic farms, respectively. Acidification calculated in SO 2 -equivalents was high, but the extensified (119 kg SO 2 ha −1 ) and the organic farms (107 kg SO 2 ha −1 ) emit a lower amount compared with the intensive farms (136 kg SO 2 ha −1 ). Eutrophication potential computed in PO 4 -equivalents was higher for intensive (54.2 kg PO 4 ha −1 ) compared with extensified (31.2 kg PO 4 ha −1 ) and organic farms (13.5 kg PO 4 ha −1 ). Farmgate balances for N (80.1, 31.4 and 31.1 kg ha −1 ) and P (5.3, 4.5 and −2.3 kg ha −1 ) for intensive, extensified and organic farms, respectively, indicate the different impacts on ground and surface water quality. Analysing the impact categories biodiversity, landscape image and animal husbandry, organic farms had clear advantages in the indicators number of grassland species, grazing cattle, layout of farmstead and herd management, but indices in these categories showed a wide range and are partly independent of the farming system.

Journal

Agriculture, Ecosystems & EnvironmentElsevier

Published: Jan 1, 2001

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off