Comparative assessment of global warming impact and eco-efficiency of PS (polystyrene), PET (polyethylene terephthalate) and PLA (polylactic acid) boxes

Comparative assessment of global warming impact and eco-efficiency of PS (polystyrene), PET... The life cycle assessment is an important tool to assess the environmental impacts of petroleum- and bio-based plastics. This study assessed the global warming potential and eco-efficiency of single used boxes, namely polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate and polylactic acid, from cradle to grave. The effects of carbon uptake from photosynthesis and land-use change during corn plantation on global warming potential of polylactic acid boxes were considered. The global warming impact of the studied materials under various waste management scenarios was studied and compared. It was found that polystyrene in landfill created the lowest global warming impact (51.4 kg CO2 equivalent). Next, polylactic acid with photosynthesis in compost exhibited the second greatest environmental benefits (152.2 kg CO2 equivalent). Whereas, polylactic acid with land-use change in landfill revealed the highest global warming impact (773.5 kg CO2 equivalent). The global warming impact of polylactic acid with photosynthesis was lower by 20–51% than that of polylactic acid with land-use change in all waste management scenarios. Polystyrene in landfill was the most favorable eco-efficiency because of its lowest total cost with relatively low global warming impact. In conclusion for bio-based boxes, polylactic acid with photosynthesis in compost showed the highest eco-efficiency. The eco-efficiency of polylactic acid boxes can be significantly improved by minimizing the resin prices and disposal in the suitable waste management by composting. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Cleaner Production Elsevier

Comparative assessment of global warming impact and eco-efficiency of PS (polystyrene), PET (polyethylene terephthalate) and PLA (polylactic acid) boxes

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/comparative-assessment-of-global-warming-impact-and-eco-efficiency-of-18EW0dlMSE
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0959-6526
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.029
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The life cycle assessment is an important tool to assess the environmental impacts of petroleum- and bio-based plastics. This study assessed the global warming potential and eco-efficiency of single used boxes, namely polystyrene, polyethylene terephthalate and polylactic acid, from cradle to grave. The effects of carbon uptake from photosynthesis and land-use change during corn plantation on global warming potential of polylactic acid boxes were considered. The global warming impact of the studied materials under various waste management scenarios was studied and compared. It was found that polystyrene in landfill created the lowest global warming impact (51.4 kg CO2 equivalent). Next, polylactic acid with photosynthesis in compost exhibited the second greatest environmental benefits (152.2 kg CO2 equivalent). Whereas, polylactic acid with land-use change in landfill revealed the highest global warming impact (773.5 kg CO2 equivalent). The global warming impact of polylactic acid with photosynthesis was lower by 20–51% than that of polylactic acid with land-use change in all waste management scenarios. Polystyrene in landfill was the most favorable eco-efficiency because of its lowest total cost with relatively low global warming impact. In conclusion for bio-based boxes, polylactic acid with photosynthesis in compost showed the highest eco-efficiency. The eco-efficiency of polylactic acid boxes can be significantly improved by minimizing the resin prices and disposal in the suitable waste management by composting.

Journal

Journal of Cleaner ProductionElsevier

Published: Jul 1, 2016

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off