Camera field-of-view and fish abundance estimation: A comparison of individual-based model output and empirical data

Camera field-of-view and fish abundance estimation: A comparison of individual-based model output... Camera technology is evolving rapidly as computing and sensor technology reduces in size and increases in processing speed. This convergence of high speed computing and optics has resulted in the creation of full-spherical cameras and their application in marine environments has begun. Thus, there is a need to understand how large increases in camera field-of-view (FOV) impacts data collection and statistical inference, particularly when dealing with long-term time-series data. Data collected in this survey consisted of a single year of sampling and were insufficient to describe relationships for single species, therefore we species were grouped based on lineage and behavior into snappers, jacks, and mixed-reef groups. The empirical and theoretical models presented here demonstrate an asymptotic relationship between single-camera MaxN and four-camera MaxN counts for snappers and to a lesser extent the mixed reef groups composed primarily of groupers. In contrast the jack group showed a linear relationship between counts. This result suggests that accuracy of the counts can be improved by increasing camera field-of-view to 360° or full-spherical. Habitat complexity was demonstrated to be positively related to fish counts but had no effect on the relationship between camera FOV and fish counts. This could be the result of several things, 1) fish behavior is more critical in driving aggregative behaviors that modify the relationship between FOV and fish counts, 2) abundances observed in this region are not high enough for habitat effects to have impacted the relationship, or 3) a mixture of these effects. Further exploration of these relationships is needed that would improve sample sizes, more observations at high counts, and that establish species specific relationships. This work provides empirical footing to further develop the relationship between MaxN-type estimators relative to camera FOV and additionally includes insight into the effects of habitat. Critically, this work provides a method to relate counts produced from 360° systems to those produced with restricted FOV. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology Elsevier

Camera field-of-view and fish abundance estimation: A comparison of individual-based model output and empirical data

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/camera-field-of-view-and-fish-abundance-estimation-a-comparison-of-vw6Lc6Z4aj
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0022-0981
eISSN
1879-1697
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.jembe.2018.01.004
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Camera technology is evolving rapidly as computing and sensor technology reduces in size and increases in processing speed. This convergence of high speed computing and optics has resulted in the creation of full-spherical cameras and their application in marine environments has begun. Thus, there is a need to understand how large increases in camera field-of-view (FOV) impacts data collection and statistical inference, particularly when dealing with long-term time-series data. Data collected in this survey consisted of a single year of sampling and were insufficient to describe relationships for single species, therefore we species were grouped based on lineage and behavior into snappers, jacks, and mixed-reef groups. The empirical and theoretical models presented here demonstrate an asymptotic relationship between single-camera MaxN and four-camera MaxN counts for snappers and to a lesser extent the mixed reef groups composed primarily of groupers. In contrast the jack group showed a linear relationship between counts. This result suggests that accuracy of the counts can be improved by increasing camera field-of-view to 360° or full-spherical. Habitat complexity was demonstrated to be positively related to fish counts but had no effect on the relationship between camera FOV and fish counts. This could be the result of several things, 1) fish behavior is more critical in driving aggregative behaviors that modify the relationship between FOV and fish counts, 2) abundances observed in this region are not high enough for habitat effects to have impacted the relationship, or 3) a mixture of these effects. Further exploration of these relationships is needed that would improve sample sizes, more observations at high counts, and that establish species specific relationships. This work provides empirical footing to further develop the relationship between MaxN-type estimators relative to camera FOV and additionally includes insight into the effects of habitat. Critically, this work provides a method to relate counts produced from 360° systems to those produced with restricted FOV.

Journal

Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and EcologyElsevier

Published: Apr 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Unlimited reading

Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.

Stay up to date

Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.

Organize your research

It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve Freelancer

DeepDyve Pro

Price
FREE
$49/month

$360/year
Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed
Create lists to
organize your research
Export lists, citations
Read DeepDyve articles
Abstract access only
Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles
Print
20 pages/month
PDF Discount
20% off