‘As we all know’: Examining Chinese EFL learners' use of interpersonal grammatical metaphor in academic writing

‘As we all know’: Examining Chinese EFL learners' use of interpersonal grammatical metaphor... This article investigates Chinese EFL learners' use of evaluation and stance in academic texts by exploring their deployment of interpersonal grammatical metaphors (IGM), a construct mapped within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL; Halliday, 1985; e.g., I believe, it is evident, etc.). The data is drawn from the Chinese Longitudinal Learner Corpus (CLLC), a two-year diachronic study into university learners' development of academic literacy (Liardet, 2014a). When examining IGM, it is important to distinguish which metaphors of modality achieve the registers valued in academic discourse, namely, epistemic metaphors construed objectively (Hyland, 1998a; Schleppegrell, 2002). In the analysis of the CLLC, a widely used construction emerged, that of as we all know (e.g., it is known to all, as we know, etc.). To account for this construct, an additional axis has been mapped across Halliday's (1985) model of IGM. Building on SFL's framework of Appraisal and specifically, the system of ‘engagement’, the axis of expansion is used here to distinguish expressions that expand the ‘dialogic space’ (e.g., it is suggested; Martin & White, 2005; see also, Hyland, 2000, 2002) from those that contract this space (e.g., it is certain). In addition to the Chinese EFL learners' reliance on such deontic, contracting metaphors, this paper explores their preference for subjective realizations and identifies key areas for pedagogical intervention. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png English for Specific Purposes Elsevier

‘As we all know’: Examining Chinese EFL learners' use of interpersonal grammatical metaphor in academic writing

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/as-we-all-know-examining-chinese-efl-learners-use-of-interpersonal-KYDL5RzYVB
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0889-4906
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.005
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article investigates Chinese EFL learners' use of evaluation and stance in academic texts by exploring their deployment of interpersonal grammatical metaphors (IGM), a construct mapped within Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL; Halliday, 1985; e.g., I believe, it is evident, etc.). The data is drawn from the Chinese Longitudinal Learner Corpus (CLLC), a two-year diachronic study into university learners' development of academic literacy (Liardet, 2014a). When examining IGM, it is important to distinguish which metaphors of modality achieve the registers valued in academic discourse, namely, epistemic metaphors construed objectively (Hyland, 1998a; Schleppegrell, 2002). In the analysis of the CLLC, a widely used construction emerged, that of as we all know (e.g., it is known to all, as we know, etc.). To account for this construct, an additional axis has been mapped across Halliday's (1985) model of IGM. Building on SFL's framework of Appraisal and specifically, the system of ‘engagement’, the axis of expansion is used here to distinguish expressions that expand the ‘dialogic space’ (e.g., it is suggested; Martin & White, 2005; see also, Hyland, 2000, 2002) from those that contract this space (e.g., it is certain). In addition to the Chinese EFL learners' reliance on such deontic, contracting metaphors, this paper explores their preference for subjective realizations and identifies key areas for pedagogical intervention.

Journal

English for Specific PurposesElsevier

Published: Apr 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off