An investigation of consumer's choice of a healthcare facility when user-generated anecdotal information is integrated into healthcare public reports

An investigation of consumer's choice of a healthcare facility when user-generated anecdotal... Recently, federal agencies began providing data in healthcare public reports comparing the quality of various healthcare providers to enable consumers to make informed choices about their healthcare needs. Though there is a rise in the number of consumers searching online for hospital reports, the inadequate design of the system prevents them from completing their search. This research investigates the effect on a consumer's choice of a healthcare facility when anecdotal information is incorporated into healthcare public reports. A 2 × 3 × 2 between-subjects experimental study was conducted with 362 participants using anecdotal information, performance metrics, the phase of introduction of anecdotal information within the report and their interaction terms as predictors. The findings suggest that the nature of anecdotal information moderates the relationship between the quality of the facility based on public reports and the decision to go to that facility. The probability of choosing other hospitals was high when the hospitals presented had negative anecdotal comments. In addition, participants tend to rely on both anecdotal and public report information when making decisions about their choice of facility. However, they relied more on performance metrics when anecdotal comments were positive. The findings showed the need to integrate accurate, trustworthy user-generated comments into the reports generated by federal agencies. To further enhance the decision making and mitigate negative biases associated with the information, additional mechanisms such as summarized measures of performance metrics and reputation scores of the reviewers could be provided. Moreover, there is a need to identify better data presentation strategies to minimize the cognitive load experienced by the consumers. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics Elsevier

An investigation of consumer's choice of a healthcare facility when user-generated anecdotal information is integrated into healthcare public reports

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/an-investigation-of-consumer-s-choice-of-a-healthcare-facility-when-6mddyX3GPD
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V.
ISSN
0169-8141
eISSN
1872-8219
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.ergon.2018.03.003
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Recently, federal agencies began providing data in healthcare public reports comparing the quality of various healthcare providers to enable consumers to make informed choices about their healthcare needs. Though there is a rise in the number of consumers searching online for hospital reports, the inadequate design of the system prevents them from completing their search. This research investigates the effect on a consumer's choice of a healthcare facility when anecdotal information is incorporated into healthcare public reports. A 2 × 3 × 2 between-subjects experimental study was conducted with 362 participants using anecdotal information, performance metrics, the phase of introduction of anecdotal information within the report and their interaction terms as predictors. The findings suggest that the nature of anecdotal information moderates the relationship between the quality of the facility based on public reports and the decision to go to that facility. The probability of choosing other hospitals was high when the hospitals presented had negative anecdotal comments. In addition, participants tend to rely on both anecdotal and public report information when making decisions about their choice of facility. However, they relied more on performance metrics when anecdotal comments were positive. The findings showed the need to integrate accurate, trustworthy user-generated comments into the reports generated by federal agencies. To further enhance the decision making and mitigate negative biases associated with the information, additional mechanisms such as summarized measures of performance metrics and reputation scores of the reviewers could be provided. Moreover, there is a need to identify better data presentation strategies to minimize the cognitive load experienced by the consumers.

Journal

International Journal of Industrial ErgonomicsElsevier

Published: Jul 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off