Species richness, endemism, and threat status represent different biodiversity attributes important in identifying biodiversity hotspots and conservation priorities. Global distributions of areas with the most species overall, most endemic species, and most threatened species are often not coincident. Previous studies have only considered single patterns or have considered patterns separately, such that an integrated biodiversity index is needed for biodiversity assessment and conservation planning. Based on a comprehensive database of amphibian distributions in China, we analyzed the congruence of species richness (SR), endemic species richness (EMSR), IUCN threatened species richness (THSR), proportion of endemic species (%EM), and proportion of IUCN threatened species (%TH). To identify conservation priorities and protection gaps for Chinese amphibians, we explored an integrated indicator that simultaneously considered the five biodiversity patterns using principal component analyses. Although we found significant nonlinearities among SR, EMSR, and THSR patterns, their relationships to %EM and %TH were weak, and overlaps in hotspots of the five biodiversity types were limited. Our results showed that amphibian biodiversity hotspots are focused in southern, southwestern, and central China, and that the national protected area network is not effective in representing amphibian species distributions and addressing amphibian conservation priorities in China. The network is particularly ineffective in the south, which has the highest biodiversity in China, but small and insufficient protected areas. Policy, governance, and the protected area system must be revised and improved. We provide an integrated biodiversity indicator that can provide a reference for conservation priority setting for different taxa in other areas.
Biological Conservation – Elsevier
Published: Nov 1, 2015
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly
Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.
Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera