A volume-based approach to phase equilibrium calculations at pressure and temperature specifications

A volume-based approach to phase equilibrium calculations at pressure and temperature specifications Phase equilibrium calculations at pressure and temperature specifications, consisting in the minimization of the Gibbs free energy with respect to mole numbers, are the most commonly used and are well documented in the literature. A very attractive alternative is given by the volume-based calculations, in which the volume and mole numbers, which are the natural variables for pressure explicit equations of state (EoS) are treated as independent variables; in this case pressure equality is an additional equation for each phase and there is no need to solve the EoS for volume. The problem is a bound- and linear inequality-constrained optimization problem; the objective function is a formal Gibbs free energy. A major disadvantage is that, unlike in conventional calculations, the successive substitution method cannot be used, thus robust modified Newton iterations are required. Using the block structure of the Hessian matrix, a link is established between conventional and volume-based Newton iterations and it is shown that the latter are inherently slower than the former due to a lower implicitness level in the Hessian. A modified Cholesky factorization (to ensure a descent direction) and a two-stage line search procedure (ensuring that iterates remain in the feasible domain and the objective function is decreasing between two iterations) are used in Newton iterations. Numerical experiments carried out on several test mixtures show that two-phase volume-based flashes initialized from the ideal equilibrium constants pose systematic convergence problems near phase boundaries, while the algorithm is rapid and robust when initial guesses from stability testing are used. The proposed algorithm is not dependent on the thermodynamic model and any pressure explicit EoS can be used, provided the required partial derivatives are available. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Fluid Phase Equilibria Elsevier

A volume-based approach to phase equilibrium calculations at pressure and temperature specifications

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/a-volume-based-approach-to-phase-equilibrium-calculations-at-pressure-gEekccpRri
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V.
ISSN
0378-3812
eISSN
1879-0224
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.fluid.2017.12.021
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Phase equilibrium calculations at pressure and temperature specifications, consisting in the minimization of the Gibbs free energy with respect to mole numbers, are the most commonly used and are well documented in the literature. A very attractive alternative is given by the volume-based calculations, in which the volume and mole numbers, which are the natural variables for pressure explicit equations of state (EoS) are treated as independent variables; in this case pressure equality is an additional equation for each phase and there is no need to solve the EoS for volume. The problem is a bound- and linear inequality-constrained optimization problem; the objective function is a formal Gibbs free energy. A major disadvantage is that, unlike in conventional calculations, the successive substitution method cannot be used, thus robust modified Newton iterations are required. Using the block structure of the Hessian matrix, a link is established between conventional and volume-based Newton iterations and it is shown that the latter are inherently slower than the former due to a lower implicitness level in the Hessian. A modified Cholesky factorization (to ensure a descent direction) and a two-stage line search procedure (ensuring that iterates remain in the feasible domain and the objective function is decreasing between two iterations) are used in Newton iterations. Numerical experiments carried out on several test mixtures show that two-phase volume-based flashes initialized from the ideal equilibrium constants pose systematic convergence problems near phase boundaries, while the algorithm is rapid and robust when initial guesses from stability testing are used. The proposed algorithm is not dependent on the thermodynamic model and any pressure explicit EoS can be used, provided the required partial derivatives are available.

Journal

Fluid Phase EquilibriaElsevier

Published: Apr 15, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off