A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research studies on factors affecting safe food handling at retail and food service

A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research studies on factors affecting... Foodborne disease outbreaks are frequently associated with improper food handling at retail and food service settings, indicating a need to improve food safety practices among food handlers. Many qualitative research studies have been conducted to examine food handlers' opinions, perspectives, and experiences with safe food handling in an effort to understand the factors associated with their use of such practices. The aim of this systematic review was a synthesis of the findings from relevant studies to identify the main across-study themes and develop recommendations for interventions and future research. The following steps used to conduct the review were developed a priori as part of the study protocol: a comprehensive search strategy; relevance screening of abstracts; relevance confirmation of articles; study quality assessment; data extraction; thematic synthesis of results; and quality-of-evidence assessment. We identified 28 relevant articles reporting on 26 unique studies. Behavioural determinants were grouped according to constructs from the Theoretical Domain Framework, and further mapped onto the COM-B model of the Behaviour Change Wheel. A total of 13 categories of determinants of safe food handling were identified. Of these categories, overall confidence ratings were assigned and rated as high (n = 9) and moderate (n = 4). The analysis revealed that: 1) food handlers typically demonstrated good knowledge and had positive attitudes toward training; 2) environmental factors (e.g. policies, resources), reinforcement (e.g. posters, reminders), emotions (e.g. stress), and social influences played a significant role in food handlers' intentions and practices; 3) food handlers were confident in their abilities and showed positive beliefs relating to consequences of unsafe food handling; 4) they demonstrated a lack of motivation to perform safe food handling practices and experienced lapses in concentration; and 5) culturally diverse food handlers had unique barriers such as language and communication. Areas for future research and recommendations for policy and practice are discussed. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Food Control Elsevier

A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research studies on factors affecting safe food handling at retail and food service

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/a-systematic-review-and-thematic-synthesis-of-qualitative-research-HiD52AJIWT
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0956-7135
eISSN
1873-7129
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.01.028
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Foodborne disease outbreaks are frequently associated with improper food handling at retail and food service settings, indicating a need to improve food safety practices among food handlers. Many qualitative research studies have been conducted to examine food handlers' opinions, perspectives, and experiences with safe food handling in an effort to understand the factors associated with their use of such practices. The aim of this systematic review was a synthesis of the findings from relevant studies to identify the main across-study themes and develop recommendations for interventions and future research. The following steps used to conduct the review were developed a priori as part of the study protocol: a comprehensive search strategy; relevance screening of abstracts; relevance confirmation of articles; study quality assessment; data extraction; thematic synthesis of results; and quality-of-evidence assessment. We identified 28 relevant articles reporting on 26 unique studies. Behavioural determinants were grouped according to constructs from the Theoretical Domain Framework, and further mapped onto the COM-B model of the Behaviour Change Wheel. A total of 13 categories of determinants of safe food handling were identified. Of these categories, overall confidence ratings were assigned and rated as high (n = 9) and moderate (n = 4). The analysis revealed that: 1) food handlers typically demonstrated good knowledge and had positive attitudes toward training; 2) environmental factors (e.g. policies, resources), reinforcement (e.g. posters, reminders), emotions (e.g. stress), and social influences played a significant role in food handlers' intentions and practices; 3) food handlers were confident in their abilities and showed positive beliefs relating to consequences of unsafe food handling; 4) they demonstrated a lack of motivation to perform safe food handling practices and experienced lapses in concentration; and 5) culturally diverse food handlers had unique barriers such as language and communication. Areas for future research and recommendations for policy and practice are discussed.

Journal

Food ControlElsevier

Published: Jul 1, 2018

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off