A new multi-criteria decision making approach for sustainable material selection problem: A critical study on rank reversal problem

A new multi-criteria decision making approach for sustainable material selection problem: A... The selection of appropriate materials for sustainable development of products is a very intricate process. Sustainable material selection problems with various non commensurable and incompatible decision factors can be efficiently handled using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. However, these methods suffer from a general and famous problem, namely rank reversal. In this phenomenon the ordering of alternatives inverts when an alternative is added or eliminated from the list of alternatives. In this paper, we reveal that COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment), TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, Serbian term) as three of the most popular techniques in material selection area may produce rank reversal when an option is removed from or added to a decision process. Moreover, we provide a comparative analysis about the rank reversal problem in the aforementioned MCDM methods. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to study rank reversal phenomenon for general material selection problem using more than 100 scientific references. Finally, we suggest a new MCDM-based method for helping decision maker (DM) to select the best sustainable material against the rank reversal pitfall. We exemplify our reasoning with thirteen real-world cases adopted from literature. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Cleaner Production Elsevier

A new multi-criteria decision making approach for sustainable material selection problem: A critical study on rank reversal problem

19 pages
Read Article

Loading next page...
 
/lp/elsevier/a-new-multi-criteria-decision-making-approach-for-sustainable-material-hD29A7XGT5
Publisher
Elsevier
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
ISSN
0959-6526
D.O.I.
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.062
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The selection of appropriate materials for sustainable development of products is a very intricate process. Sustainable material selection problems with various non commensurable and incompatible decision factors can be efficiently handled using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods. However, these methods suffer from a general and famous problem, namely rank reversal. In this phenomenon the ordering of alternatives inverts when an alternative is added or eliminated from the list of alternatives. In this paper, we reveal that COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment), TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and VIKOR (VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, Serbian term) as three of the most popular techniques in material selection area may produce rank reversal when an option is removed from or added to a decision process. Moreover, we provide a comparative analysis about the rank reversal problem in the aforementioned MCDM methods. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to study rank reversal phenomenon for general material selection problem using more than 100 scientific references. Finally, we suggest a new MCDM-based method for helping decision maker (DM) to select the best sustainable material against the rank reversal pitfall. We exemplify our reasoning with thirteen real-world cases adopted from literature.

Journal

Journal of Cleaner Production – Elsevier

Published: May 1, 2018

References

  • Simple additive weighting methods of multi criteria decision making and applications: a decade review
    Abdullah, L.; Adawiyah, C.W.R.
  • Multi-criteria evaluation model for the selection of sustainable materials for building projects
    Akadiri, P.O.; Olomolaiye, P.O.; A Chinyio, E.
  • Material selection for environmental responsibility: the case of soft drinks packaging in Brazil
    Almeida, C.; Rodrigues, A.J.M.; Agostinho, F.
  • Measuring congruence of ranking results applying particular MCDM methods
    Antucheviciene, J.; Zakarevicius, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.
  • Ranking redevelopment decisions of derelict buildings and analysis of ranking results
    Antucheviciene, J.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Zakarevičius, A.
  • Raw material selection for pulping and papermaking using TOPSIS multiple criteria decision making design
    Anupam, K.; Lal, P.S.; Bist, V.; Sharma, A.K.; Swaroop, V.
  • Sustainable raw material selection for pulp and paper using SAW multiple criteria decision making design
    Anupam, K.; Swaroop, V.; Sharma, A.K.; Lal, P.S.; Bist, V.
  • A comparative study on the ranking performance of some multi-criteria decision-making methods for industrial robot selection
    Athawale, V.M.; Chakraborty, S.
  • Decision making for material selection using the UTA method
    Athawale, V.M.; Kumar, R.; Chakraborty, S.
  • A De Novo multi-approaches multi-criteria decision making technique with an application in performance evaluation of material handling device
    Bairagi, B.; Dey, B.; Sarkar, B.; Sanyal, S.K.
  • AHP rank reversal, normalization and aggregation rules
    Barzilai, J.; Golany, B.
  • Power relations and group aggregation in the multiplicative AHP and SMART
    Barzilai, J.; Lootsma, F.A.
  • The legitimacy of rank reversal—a comment
    Belton, V.; Gear, T.
  • PROMETHEE Methods, Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis
    Brans, J.P.; De Smet, Y.
  • Early-stage sustainability assessment to assist with material selection: a case study for biobased printer panels
    Broeren, M.L.M.; Molenveld, K.; Van den Oever, M.J.A.
  • Rank disagreement: a comparison of multi-criteria methodologies
    Buede, D.M.; Maxwell, D.T.
  • A Simulation Comparison of Normalization Procedures for TOPSIS
    Chakraborty, S.; Yeh, C.H.
  • Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods
    Çalışkan, H.; Kurşuncu, B.; Kurbanoğlu, C.; Güven, Ş.Y.
  • Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods
    Chatterjee, P.; Athawale, V.M.; Chakraborty, S.
  • Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods
    Chatterjee, P.; Athawale, V.M.; Chakraborty, S.
  • Material selection using preferential ranking methods
    Chatterjee, P.; Chakraborty, S.
  • A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method
    Dehghan-Manshadi, B.; Mahmudi, H.; Abedian, A.
  • A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods
    De Keyser, W.; Peeters, P.
  • Multi objective performance analysis: a novel multi-criteria decision making approach for a supply chain
    Dey, B.; Bairagi, B.; Sarkar, B.; Sanyal, S.K.
  • Material selection using analytical hierarchy process
    Dweiri, F.; Al-Oqla, F.M.
  • Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: the next ten years
    Dyer, J.S.; Fishburn, P.C.; E Steuer, R.; Wallenius, J.; Zionts, S.
  • A new belief function based approach for multi-criteria decision-making support
    Dezert, J.; Han, D.; Yin, H.
  • Introducing a novel method for materials selection in mechanical design using Z-transformation in statistics for normalization of material properties
    Fayazbakhsh, K.; Abedian, A.; Manshadi, B.D.
  • The analytic hierarchy process: can was criteria be ignored
    Finan, J.S.; Hurley, W.J.
  • Materials selection for lighter wagon design with a weighted property index method
    Findik, F.; Turan, K.
  • A multiple stakeholders' approach to strategic selection decisions
    Firouzabadi, S.M.A.K.; Henson, B.; Barnes, C.
  • Application of complex proportional assessment method for vendor selection
    Gadakh, V.S.
  • On rank reversal and TOPSIS method
    García-Cascales, M.S.; Lamata, M.T.
  • Selection of the optimal real estate investment project basing on multiple criteria evaluation using stochastic dimensions
    Ginevičius, R.; Zubrecovas, V.
  • Application of fuzzy VIKOR and environmental impact analysis for material selection of an automotive component
    Girubha, R.J.; Vinodh, S.
  • Sustainable material selection for construction industry–A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach
    Govindan, K.; Shankar, K.M.; Kannan, D.
  • Building public confidence in energy planning: a multi method MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas
    Hobbs, B.F.; Horn, G.T.F.
  • Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, R.E.
  • A Revised VIKOR Model for Multiple Criteria Decision Making-The Perspective of Regret Theory, Cutting-edge Research Topics on Multiple Criteria Decision Making
    Huang, J.J.; Tzeng, G.H.; Liu, H.H.
  • Eliminating Rank Reversal Phenomenon in GRA–based Network Selection Method
    Huszak, A.; Imre, S.
  • Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
    Hwang, C.L.; Yoon, K.
  • A target-based normalization technique for materials selection
    Jahan, A.; Bahraminasab, M.; Edwards, K.L.
  • A state-of-the-art survey on the influence of normalization techniques in ranking: improving the materials selection process in engineering design
    Jahan, A.; Edwards, K.L.
  • Material screening and choosing methods–a review
    Jahan, A.; Ismail, M.Y.; Sapuan, S.M.; Mustapha, F.
  • A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection
    Jahan, A.; Mustapha, F.; Ismail, M.Y.; Sapuan, S.M.
  • A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory
    Jee, D.H.; Kang, K.J.
  • Material selection for femoral component of total knee replacement integrating fuzzy AHP with PROMETHEE
    Kabir, G.; Lizu, A.
  • Applications of utility concept and desirability function for materials selection
    Karande, P.; Gauri, S.K.; Chakraborty, S.
  • A simplified fuzzy logic approach for materials selection in mechanical engineering design
    Khabbaz, R.S.; Manshadi, B.D.; Abedian, A.; Mahmudi, R.
  • Comparative analysis between TOPSIS and PSI methods of materials selection to achieve a desirable combination of strength and workability in Al/SiC composite
    Khorshidi, R.; Hassani, A.
  • Selection of an optimal refinement condition to achieve maximum tensile properties of Al–15% Mg 2 Si composite based on TOPSIS method
    Khorshidi, R.; Hassani, A.; Rauof, A.H.; Emamy, M.
  • Rank reversal and rank preservation in ANP method
    Kong, F.; Wei, W.; Gong, J.H.
  • Penstock material selection in small hydropower plants using MADM methods
    Kumar, R.; Singal, S.K.
  • An Enhanced-TOPSIS Based Network Selection Technique for Next Generation Wireless Networks
    Lahby, M.; Cherkaoui, L.; Adib, A.
  • A preference-based interpretation of AHP
    Lai, S.K.
  • Customer satisfaction evaluation method for customized product development using Entropy weight and Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Li, L.; Liu, F.; Li, C.
  • Note on “Wash criterion in analytic hierarchy process”
    Lin, J.S.J.; Chou, S.Y.; Chouhuang, W.T.; Hsu, C.P.
  • Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products
    Ljungberg, L.Y.
  • Use of multicriteria decision analysis methods for energy planning problems
    Løken, E.
  • PROMETHEE and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP
    Macharis, C.; Springael, J.; De Brucker, K.; Verbeke, A.
  • Grinding wheel abrasive material selection using fuzzy TOPSIS method
    Maity, S.R.; Chakraborty, S.
  • Multi-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: the case of Cyprus
    Mergias, I.; Moustakas, K.; Papadopoulos, A.
  • The effect of normalization norms in multiple attribute decision making models: a case study in gear material selection
    Milani, A.S.; Shanian, A.; Madoliat, R.; Nemes, J.A.
  • A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems
    Mousavi-Nasab, S.H.; Sotoudeh-Anvari, A.
  • An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method
    Mulliner, E.; Smallbone, K.; Maliene, V.
  • The comparative analysis of MCDA methods SAW and COPRAS
    Podvezko, V.
  • Peer evaluation of multi-attribute analysis techniques: case of a light rail transit network choice
    Poorzahedy, H.; Rezaei, A.
  • Evaluating relationship of consistency ratio and number of alternatives on rank reversal in the AHP
    Raharjo, H.; Endah, D.
  • Digital tools for material selection in product design
    Ramalhete, P.S.; Senos, A.M.R.; Aguiar, C.
  • Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process
    Ramanathan, R.
  • Comparing perceived and expected service using an AHP model: an application to measure service quality of a company engaged in pharmaceutical distribution
    Ramanathan, R.; Karpuzcu, H.
  • Comparative analysis of a novel M-TOPSIS method and TOPSIS
    Ren, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Z.
  • A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method
    Rezaei, J.; Nispeling, T.; Sarkis, J.; Tavasszy, L.
  • A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach
    Rao, R.V.
  • Comparison of Different MADM Methods for Different Decision Making Situations of the Manufacturing Environment, Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods
    Rao, R.V.
  • An essay on rank preservation and reversal
    Saaty, T.L.; Sagir, M.
  • The legitimacy of rank reversal
    Saaty, T.L.; Vargas, L.G.
  • Experiments on rank preservation and reversal in relative measurement
    Saaty, T.L.; Vargas, L.G.
  • Optimal design of flyash filled composite friction materials using combined analytical hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions approach
    Satapathy, B.K.; Majumdar, A.; Tomar, B.S.
  • Comparing Multi-criteria Decision Aid Methods through a Ranking Stability Index
    Selmi, M.; Kormi, T.; Ali, N.B.H.
  • TOPSIS-based dynamic approach for mobile network interface selection
    Senouci, M.A.; Mushtaq, M.S.; Hoceini, S.; Mellouk, A.
  • TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell
    Shanian, A.; Savadogo, O.
  • An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making
    Shih, H.S.; Shyur, H.J.; Lee, E.S.
  • Survey on rank preservation and rank reversal in data envelopment analysis
    Soltanifar, M.; Shahghobadi, S.
  • A new approach based on the level of reliability of information to determine the relative weights of criteria in fuzzy TOPSIS
    Sotoudeh-Anvari, A.; Sadi-Nezhad, S.
  • A hybrid fuzzy MCDM method for measuring the performance of publicly held pharmaceutical companies
    Tavana, M.; Khalili-Damghani, K.; Rahmatian, R.
  • Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods, Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: a Comparative Study
    Triantaphyllou, E.
  • Two new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP
    Triantaphyllou, E.
  • An examination of the effectiveness of multi-dimensional decision-making methods: a decision-making paradox
    Triantaphyllou, E.; Mann, S.H.
  • Comments on Barzilai and Lootsma: why the multiplicative AHP is invalid: a practical counterexample
    Vargas, L.G.
  • An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods
    Velasquez, M.; Hester, P.T.
  • An integrated AHP–DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment
    Wang, Y.M.; Liu, J.; Elhag, T.M.S.
  • A novel hybrid MCDM model combining the SAW, TOPSIS and GRA methods based on experimental design
    Wang, P.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, Y.
  • Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods
    Wang, X.; Triantaphyllou, E.
  • An approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP
    Wang, Y.M.; Elhag, T.M.S.
  • On rank reversal in decision analysis
    Wang, Y.M.; Luo, Y.
  • Elsevier Materials Selector, Elsevier Applied Science
    Waterman, N.A.; Ashby, M.F.
  • Correcting illegitimate rank reversals: proper adjustment of criteria weights prevent alleged AHP intransitivity
    Wijnmalen, D.J.D.; Wedley, W.C.
  • A comparative study on material selection of microelectromechanical systems electrostatic actuators using Ashby, VIKOR and TOPSIS
    Yazdani, M.; Payam, A.F.
  • Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods
    Zanakis, S.H.; Solomon, A.; Wishart, N.; Dublish, S.
  • A material selection methodology and expert system for sustainable product design
    Zarandi, M.H.F.; Mansour, S.; Hosseinijou, S.A.
  • State of Art Surveys of Overviews on MCDM/MADM Methods, and Economic Development of Economy
    Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z.; Kildienė, S.
  • Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach
    Zhou, C.C.; Yin, G.F.; Hu, X.B.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.

Try 2 weeks free now

DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

or browse the journals available

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create lists to
organize your research

Export lists, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off

Sign up
for free
Start 14 day
Free Trial