Supply chain sustainability management is gaining increasing importance. Several studies propose quantitative evaluation approaches to manage sustainable supply chains. However, none of the studies focus on the selection and weighting of the metrics as a group decision process and in a way that considers the degree of difficulty of collecting data for measuring performance on a particular metric. Therefore, this paper proposes a group decision model for selecting metrics for supply chain sustainability management. The proposal is based on the combination of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets (HFLTS) with the prioritization procedure of the house of quality of the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method. HFLTS are used to represent judgments of different decision makers about the importance of supply chain sustainable performance requirements and the relationship between selected metrics and requirements. Prioritization of requirements and metrics is based on the method of distance measures between HFLTSs. The degree of difficulty of data collection is also estimated based on judgments using linguistic expressions and on distance measures of HFLTSs. An illustrative application is presented based on a first tier automobile manufacturing company. Through this illustrative example it is possible to see the benefit of using hesitant fuzzy sets to aggregate the judgments of different decision makers. It is also evident the importance of considering the degree of difficulty of data collecting as an additional argument to select and prioritize metrics. The proposed decision model can also be applied to other decision problems such as selecting criteria for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation.
Journal of Cleaner Production – Elsevier
Published: May 10, 2018
It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.
Enjoy affordable access to
over 12 million articles from more than
10,000 peer-reviewed journals.
All for just $49/month
Read as many articles as you need. Full articles with original layout, charts and figures. Read online, from anywhere.
Keep up with your field with Personalized Recommendations and Follow Journals to get automatic updates.
It’s easy to organize your research with our built-in tools.
Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.
All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.
“Hi guys, I cannot tell you how much I love this resource. Incredible. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue.”Daniel C.
“Whoa! It’s like Spotify but for academic articles.”@Phil_Robichaud
“I must say, @deepdyve is a fabulous solution to the independent researcher's problem of #access to #information.”@deepthiw
“My last article couldn't be possible without the platform @deepdyve that makes journal papers cheaper.”@JoseServera